Teams

Crooked Creek (Kim Wildstein)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Robin Schorr)

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesSusana Albisu / Vicky Vallejo vs Heather Bamburowski / Marion Earnhardt3-6, 7-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesConnie Land vs Erin Hoover2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim Wildstein / Kristin Haak vs Michelle West / April Turoczi5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCarly Sedney / Suzie Hill vs Sandra Williams / Gabriela Billings2-6, 6-0, 6-3
W#4 DoublesKaren Mays / Lori Colapietro vs Holly Lopez / Nichelle Pate6-3, 6-2
2024-12-05vs The Manor (Rhonda Ozor)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesEllen de Bliek / Kristin Haak vs Tracey Hill / Heather Trainor1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesConnie Land vs Sandra Cornejo6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKim Wildstein / Vicky Vallejo vs Vicki Boerema / Kim Davis4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Mays / Lori Colapietro vs Michelle Robinson / Amy McGruder4-6, 7-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesCarly Sedney / Susana Albisu vs Linda Bradford / Rhonda Ozor7-6, 3-6, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKristin Haak / Connie Land vs Jessica Grant / Tracy Hefner-Ramage6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Stucke / Vicky Vallejo vs Bernadette Graham / Karen Fullett6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEllen de Bliek / Lori Colapietro vs Tiffany Butera / Jill McIntyre6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesCarly Sedney / Karen Mays vs Nancy Utz / Kim Erickson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Robin Schorr) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Heidi Stucke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Natalie King
published
3.82
Connie Land
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Lori Colapietro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Vicky Vallejo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Ellen de Bliek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Sigrid Gehrig
published
3.62
Kristin Haak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Susan Way
published
3.50
Laura Wysong
published
3.49
Kim Wildstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Suzie Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Carly Sedney
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Susana Albisu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Mays
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Murdock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Colapietro + Heidi Stucke15168% games+13.3% vs expected
Lori Colapietro + Ellen de Bliek6066% gamesnot enough data
Kim Wildstein + Heidi Stucke3261% gamesnot enough data
Kim Wildstein + Ellen de Bliek224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Wildstein + Carly Sedney123 matchesnot enough data
Ellen de Bliek + Natalie King213 matchesnot enough data
Vicky Vallejo + Kristin Haak123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heidi Stucke
33W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Natalie King
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Connie Land
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Lori Colapietro
33W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Vicky Vallejo
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Ellen de Bliek
24W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Sigrid Gehrig
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kristin Haak
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Susan Way
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Laura Wysong
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Kim Wildstein
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Suzie Hill
22W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Carly Sedney
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Susana Albisu
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
Karen Mays
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Murdock
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.