← Teams

PTC-DelaCruz

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5+ Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Steve Vanderploeg
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Kevin Vedder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Xavier Denis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Charles Taguet
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
—
Matt Chesley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Cristian Crisan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Butch Dela Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
Results7 ties
2019-06-30Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesJohn Lipp / Kevin Vedder vs Tony Szymczak / Todd Wilcox6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatt Chesley / Cristian Crisan vs David Malinowski / Tom Herkamp4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari vs Jeremy Huth2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Charles Taguet vs Mike Farrell / Mike Reiss6-1, 6-0
2019-06-23Lost 1–2
L#2 DoublesMatt Chesley / Cristian Crisan vs Mike Farrell / David Malinowski6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari vs Rory Cook7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Steve Vanderploeg vs Todd Wilcox / Jeroen Swanborn6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2019-06-09Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJohn Lipp / Kevin Vedder vs Ry Koteen / Michael Tammen6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Xavier Denis vs Brian Hendrickson / Alex Simpson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoe Warner / Steve Vanderploeg vs Keith Johnson / David Finkelman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2019-06-01Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesJohn Lipp / Kevin Vedder vs Brian Jackson / Sherwood Newell6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Xavier Denis vs Thomas McGirk / Daniel Clingo6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari vs Michael Blevens3-3
W#3 DoublesJoe Warner / Steve Vanderploeg vs James Feeney / Jeff Berman7-5, 7-6
2019-05-19Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesMatt Chesley / Xavier Denis vs Peter Dusicka / Joshua Owens6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / John Lipp vs Nathaniel Israel / Todd Gangelhoff6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari vs Mariano Pastor6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCristian Crisan / Steve Vanderploeg vs Frank Collie / John Leach6-1, 7-5
2019-05-10Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesMatt Chesley / Charles Taguet vs Jimmy Crumpacker / Frank Lippy6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoe Warner / Steve Vanderploeg vs Daniel Larsen / Todd Siegel6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari vs Greg Masson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKevin Vedder / John Lipp vs David Wiley / Dirk Koopman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2019-04-27Lost 0–3
L#2 DoublesJohn Lipp / Matt Chesley vs Daniel Larsen / David Squire6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari vs Dirk Koopman6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesButch Dela Cruz / Charles Taguet vs Andrew Nilsson / Carsten Gleeson6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Steve Vanderploeg
157W–111L career
0%99%1%
4.21
4.5
Kevin Vedder
17W–27L career
9%90%1%
4.11
4.5
Xavier Denis
16W–51L career
22%78%0%
3.97
4.5
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
62W–56L career
33%67%0%
3.92
4.5
Charles Taguet
104W–63L career
41%59%0%
3.89
4
Matt Chesley
10W–29L career
not enough data
—
4
Cristian Crisan
41W–46L career
4%96%0%
3.71
4.5
Butch Dela Cruz
36W–95L career
89%11%0%
3.69

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.