Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.5M NEL Oshkosh N HS Hammond

2024 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-30vs WI Adult 18&O 3.5M NEL Neenah HS LinSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Gahagan / Michael Heile vs Anthony Nooren / Mark Blumreiter3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Spaeth / Richard Gerstein vs PIYUSH ATRE / Pramod Shinde3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesChisim Metternich vs Michael Brandfon6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTodd Hammond / Zachary Brandt vs Chin-Yi Lin / Mitch Kroll6-4, 7-6
W#1 DoublesMichael Heile / Brian Spaeth vs Donald Copps / Andy Taylor6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRobert Prehn vs Lucas Mullen6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesZachary Brandt / David Gahagan vs Thomas Brodhagen / Ethan Hoag6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTodd Hammond / Chisim Metternich vs Thong Yang / Eric Bishop6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMichael Heile / Brian Spaeth vs Thomas Brodhagen / Kyle Oberstadt6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRobert Prehn vs Ethan Hoag3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Gerstein / Christopher Flood vs Thong Yang / Eric Bishop6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesDavid Gahagan / Michael Heile vs Anthony Nooren / Mitch Kroll6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRobert Prehn vs Scott Springmier6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Gerstein / Zachary Brandt vs Chin-Yi Lin / Allan O'Connor6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Michael Heile
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.40
Robert Prehn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Zachary Brandt
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
David Gahagan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brian Spaeth
published 3.5
3.21
Todd Hammond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Chisim Metternich
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Richard Gerstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Gahagan + Todd Hammond2353% gamesnot enough data
David Gahagan + Michael Heile213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Heile
21W–15L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Robert Prehn
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Zachary Brandt
83W–36L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
David Gahagan
35W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Brian Spaeth
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Hammond
27W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Chisim Metternich
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Richard Gerstein
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.