Teams

Conatser/40/4.0/NO/Chat

2025 NO Adult 40 & Over - Men · 4.0 NO (40&O) Men

7 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-26vs Walker/40/4.0/NO/CPWon 40
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bolton / Eric Dumonteil vs Phuong Nguyen / Danny Russo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYeon Lee vs James Graham0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVincent Asaro / Sid Trouard vs Mike Lecler / Christopher Taylor6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Conatser / Scott Shirey vs Roger Bailey / John Lindsey6-1, 7-5
2025-02-17vs Walker/40/4.0/NO/CPWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bolton / Eric Dumonteil vs Scott Walker / Phuong Nguyen6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesYeon Lee vs Steve Strain6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSid Trouard / Kelly Conatser vs Christopher Taylor / Eric Sanders4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesScott Shirey / Craig Mills vs Tony Paternostro / Steve Norris6-3, 6-2
2025-01-29vs Walker/40/4.0/NO/CPWon 40
W#1 DoublesEric Dumonteil / Kelly Conatser vs Mike Lecler / Danny Russo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYeon Lee vs James Graham6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesVincent Asaro / Sid Trouard vs Eric Sanders / Scott Walker6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCraig Mills / Scott Shirey vs Phuong Nguyen / Steve Norris6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 NO (40&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Vincent Asaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Matthew Bolton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Sid Trouard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Scott Shirey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Yeon Lee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.62
Eric Dumonteil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Kelly Conatser
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sid Trouard + Vincent Asaro224 matchesnot enough data
Sid Trouard + Eric Dumonteil033 matchesnot enough data
Eric Dumonteil + Scott Shirey123 matchesnot enough data
Eric Dumonteil + Kelly Conatser123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vincent Asaro
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
Matthew Bolton
26W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
Sid Trouard
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Scott Shirey
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Yeon Lee
11W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Eric Dumonteil
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Kelly Conatser
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.