Teams

DGlass (Park Road)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 5.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-30vs JHarling/TMacuga (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Merkelson Dermack / Alli Petersen vs Carla Sweeney / Tish Macuga7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-23vs JMugnano (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMadison Stimson / Kelly Virnig-myers vs Ashley Bejsovec / Georgia Cook1-6, 3-6
2025-09-16vs ABroemel (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Fuller / Julie Merkelson Dermack vs Janette Billings / Kelsey Davis2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Morgan / Kelly Virnig-myers vs Dhenisha Bissoon / Rebecca Musante1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaryann Whalen / Alli Petersen vs Leah Oleski / Lindsay Fleharty3-6, 0-6
2025-09-02vs TInga/Fontaine (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMaryann Whalen / Kristina Johnson vs Mallory Burns / Anait Balasanyan0-6, 1-6
2025-08-26vs LDragon/VWooten (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbie Glass / Kelly Virnig-myers vs Maggie Long / Samantha Chase1-6, 3-6
2025-08-19vs SBurke/CKlein (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Morgan / Kelly Virnig-myers vs Julie Klingman / Marie Foley2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaryann Whalen / Alli Petersen vs Crissa Klein / Kimberly Powell1-6, 1-6
2025-08-13vs JMugnano (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaryann Whalen / Madison Stimson vs Melissa Kaufman / Kimberly Wyborski0-6, 0-6
2025-08-12vs JHarling/TMacuga (Park Crossing)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaryann Whalen / Madison Stimson vs Cara Babb / Jocelyn Zuehlke2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Fuller / Kelly Virnig-myers vs Diane Hancock / Katie Parker1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.30
Alli Petersen
published 2.5
2.30
Madison Stimson
published
2.29
Debbie Glass
published 2.5
2.16
Maryann Whalen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.14
Julie Merkelson Dermack
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.10
Kelly Virnig-myers
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Glass + Madison Stimson213 matchesnot enough data
Madison Stimson + Kelly Virnig-myers033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alli Petersen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Madison Stimson
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Debbie Glass
5W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
3
Maryann Whalen
25W–113L career · 5 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.16
2.5
Julie Merkelson Dermack
4W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Kelly Virnig-myers
1W–13L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.