Teams

TRullman

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-02vs AJohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Roach / Kristen Wassel vs Alexis Johnson / Melissa Liner1-6, 2-6
2022-07-19vs PCochranWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Kendall / Kristen Wassel vs Kathy Bostrom / Gwen Hedgepeth6-3, 6-1
2022-07-12vs ARobinsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarla Williams / Kristen Wassel vs Anna Kouba / Carole Anne Hussey5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-05vs TPerroneLost 02
L#1 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Carolyn Roach vs Connie Peterson / Gillian Sellick1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Kendall / Kristen Wassel vs Traci Brooks / Terry Perrone2-6, 6-7
2022-06-28vs AJohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Kristen Wassel vs Julie Raftery / Susan Shaw0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-14vs PCochranWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarla Williams / Kristen Wassel vs Paula Cochran / Eleanor Jones6-1, 6-1
2022-06-07vs ARobinsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Carolyn Roach vs Erin Swindell / Stephanie Disbrow1-6, 5-7
2022-06-03vs TPerroneWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Roach / Erin Conigliaro vs Gillian Sellick / Jennifer Holt6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Erin Conigliaro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Samantha Starr
published
3.37
Kristen Wassel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Carolyn Roach
published 3.5
3.21
Michelle Welborn
published 3.5
3.04
Lauren Hardwick
published
2.74
Molly Clark
published
2.63
Wendy Bargoil
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Teresa Rullman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Clark + Wendy Bargoil5250% games−2.3% vs expected
Erin Conigliaro + Michelle Welborn314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin Conigliaro
175W–128L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Samantha Starr
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Kristen Wassel
129W–83L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Carolyn Roach
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Michelle Welborn
141W–118L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Lauren Hardwick
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
Molly Clark
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Wendy Bargoil
48W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Teresa Rullman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.