Teams

SoCal/Ferraro/55&Over6.0W

2024 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-16vs SDNC 6.0 RPTC (Fri)/ LevineWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Lauro / Mara Ferraro vs Giulia Cardano / Maria Schneider6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBridget Weiss / Lisa Vomero vs Tatiana Bourd / Isabel Cooper6-4, 6-4
2024-08-08vs SDNC 6.0 FRCC (Thurs)/ StromWon 10
W#1 DoublesMara Ferraro / Debbie Thomas vs Kathryn Glaser / Lori Strom6-4, 6-3
2024-08-02vs SDNC 6.0 RPTC (Fri)/ LevineWon 10
W#2 DoublesMara Ferraro / Susan Shaw vs Bunny Shin / Giulia Cardano7-6, 6-2
2024-07-11vs SDNC 6.0 FRCC (Thurs)/ StromWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Shaw / Lisa Vomero vs Felicia Kappes / Leanna Thompson7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMara Ferraro / Heidi Meyer vs Kathryn Glaser / Lori Strom6-2, 6-2
2024-07-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Shaw / Lisa Vomero vs Sandra Sweat / Karen Schmitz7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Susan Shaw
published
3.05
Heidi Meyer
published
3.03
Kelly Caponetto
published
2.86
Lisa Vomero
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Mara Ferraro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Kelly Lauro
published
2.67
Bridget Weiss
published 3
2.65
Laurie Schmid
published
Melissa Backlin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mara Ferraro + Heidi Meyer4263% games+8.0% vs expected
Lisa Vomero + Mara Ferraro7548% gamesnot enough data
Mara Ferraro + Kelly Lauro3251% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Schmid + Bridget Weiss134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Shaw
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
Heidi Meyer
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.05
Kelly Caponetto
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Lisa Vomero
32W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Mara Ferraro
37W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
2.84
Kelly Lauro
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Bridget Weiss
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Laurie Schmid
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Melissa Backlin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.