Teams

Johnson-Hickman/Springdale/SRC

2025 Adult 55 & Over Spring League · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-11vs Greer/SVCC/RogersWon 30
W#1 DoublesRonald Chioldi / Ricky Sutherlan vs Scott Letts / Jeff Greer7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSpencer Scarbrough / Robert May vs Rickard Hood / Lee Wilson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMitchell Johnson / Michael Collins vs Clay Fecht / Steven Hinkebein7-6, 7-5
2025-04-06vs Greer/SVCC/RogersWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoseph Nelson / John Ragni vs Brent Jimenez / Jeff Greer1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDonald Baird / Spencer Scarbrough vs Steven Hinkebein / Mike Hoehner7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMitchell Johnson / Paul Hickman vs Scott Letts / Mike Cicatiello6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Mitchell Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Steve Finney
published
3.26
Donald Baird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Spencer Scarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Ronald Chioldi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Paul Hickman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Joseph Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Ricky Sutherlan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
John Ragni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Tommey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Baird + Steve Finney4153% games−4.0% vs expected
Spencer Scarbrough + Paul Hickman033 matchesnot enough data
Paul Hickman + Mitchell Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mitchell Johnson
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Steve Finney
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Donald Baird
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Spencer Scarbrough
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Ronald Chioldi
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Paul Hickman
1W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Joseph Nelson
22W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Ricky Sutherlan
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
John Ragni
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Tommey
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.