Teams

KY/LOU/HEAVRIN

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-12-06vs KY/LOU/DIEHLWon 21
L#1 DoublesThomas Heavrin / Bruce Vance vs Brian Belva / John Diehl5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJoshua Littlefield vs Ben Lowry7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWes Kawata / Misha Goldentul vs Jeremy Stein / Todd Wilkinson7-6, 6-3
2025-10-12vs KY/LOU/DIEHLLost 12
L#1 DoublesQuentin Marquette / Misha Goldentul vs Joel Neaveill / Matthew Bunnell4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJason Cox vs Elijah Brown1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChris Dugger / Andrew Metcalfe vs Stephen Diehl / John Diehl6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Andrew Metcalfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Bruce Vance
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Thomas Heavrin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Ross Walton
published
3.13
Misha Goldentul
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Wes Kawata
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Chris Dugger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Jason Cox
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.08
Quentin Marquette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Joshua Littlefield
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Frank Galasso
published
2.98
Michael Marquette
published
Larry Hall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Quentin Marquette + Michael Marquette0629% games−6.7% vs expected
Wes Kawata + Misha Goldentul134 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Heavrin + Michael Marquette224 matchesnot enough data
Wes Kawata + Thomas Heavrin033 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Heavrin + Chris Dugger123 matchesnot enough data
Misha Goldentul + Michael Marquette033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Metcalfe
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Bruce Vance
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Thomas Heavrin
17W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Ross Walton
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Misha Goldentul
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Wes Kawata
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Chris Dugger
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jason Cox
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Quentin Marquette
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Joshua Littlefield
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Frank Galasso
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Michael Marquette
19W–44L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
Larry Hall
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.