Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Day/Sharples

2021 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-12-18vs CMTA @ Wasatch Hills-CarruthersWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesYoko Walljasper / Melanie Decker vs Vicki Cox / Wendy Johnstun6-3, 6-3
2021-12-04vs Sports Mall-RollinsSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesMalisa Bowen / Kelly Webster vs Megan Brown / Lexie Williams7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W#3 Female DoublesRebecca Harman / Melanie Decker vs Ashley Russell / Hannah Russell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-11-13vs Salt Lake Tennis-BaynaLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesLori Wilson / Melanie Decker vs Linda Byington / Shanna Sirstins6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-11-06vs CMTA @ Wasatch Hills-CarruthersWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesRikke Phinney / Malisa Bowen vs Kaye Moulding / Tracee Kemp6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
DeeAnn Henderson
usually #1 Female Doubles 83%, also #2 Female Doubles 17% · published 4
3.22
Yoko Walljasper
usually #1 Female Doubles 57%, also #3 Female Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.19
Kelly Webster
published
3.03
Diane Poole
published 3
3.00
Malisa Bowen
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Lori Wilson
published
2.93
Rikke Phinney
published
2.89
Rebecca Harman
published
2.64
Elaine Day
published 3
2.42
Melanie Decker
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
Molly Adams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Harman + Molly Adams7352% games+6.9% vs expected
DeeAnn Henderson + Yoko Walljasper452057% games+2.7% vs expected
Kelly Webster + Malisa Bowen554053% games+1.5% vs expected
Lori Wilson + Rebecca Harman41641% games+1.2% vs expected
Rikke Phinney + Melanie Decker3442% games+1.1% vs expected
Diane Poole + Rebecca Harman9850% games−3.7% vs expected
Elaine Day + Rebecca Harman4543% games−4.3% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Melanie Decker3443% games−4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DeeAnn Henderson
291W–224L career · 6 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Yoko Walljasper
308W–196L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
Kelly Webster
197W–131L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.19
3
Diane Poole
191W–165L career · no lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Malisa Bowen
182W–149L career · 2 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
Lori Wilson
71W–153L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.95
Rikke Phinney
44W–49L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
2.93
Rebecca Harman
241W–300L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Elaine Day
124W–248L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Melanie Decker
49W–170L career · 3 lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
2.42
Molly Adams
83W–53L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.