Teams

McKinney/Skinner M8.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT · M8.0 Sunday

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-23vs Oak Creek/Rajani-Deleonardis M8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRussel Head / Gino Diazoni vs Jae Shim / Atul Rajani1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Taft / Jason McCaslin vs Kamran Mir / Wei-Bin Lai4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatrick Skinner / Frank Klosky vs Sarosh Nayar / Muralikrishnan Shanmugam0-6, 0-6
2025-02-17vs McKinney/Megert-Thoma M8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesRussel Head / Frank Klosky vs Jim Bridges / Gary Paparella6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGino Diazoni / Jacob Garcia vs Mark Farrell / Douglas Wallace6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesIvan Goridkov / Lindsey Taft vs John Doe / David Megert6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M8.0 Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Charles Rosen
published 4
3.69
Barry Nickerson
published 4
3.64
David Gregory
published 4
3.55
Ivan Goridkov
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Jason McCaslin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Frank Klosky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Gino Diazoni
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jacob Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Taft
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Russel Head
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason McCaslin + Ivan Goridkov9260% games+2.8% vs expected
Gino Diazoni + Ivan Goridkov3448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Rosen
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Barry Nickerson
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
David Gregory
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Ivan Goridkov
36W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Jason McCaslin
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
Frank Klosky
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gino Diazoni
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacob Garcia
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Taft
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Russel Head
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.