Teams

Uncoachable

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Men 3.5 - 18 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-20vs Qualifying TeamWon 40
W#1 DoublesDanny Anslinger / Kaleb Hamilton vs Brian Thrapp / David Westphal6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesGordon Terpe vs Ross Tillman6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBruce Hazeltine / Glenn Moffatt vs Gary Carnefix / Thomas McLain6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesBrian Clifton vs Kim Walterskirchen6-1, 6-0
2021-06-19vs Qualifying TeamWon 31
L#1 DoublesDanny Anslinger / Kaleb Hamilton vs Thomas McLain / Ross Tillman6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGlenn Moffatt vs Kim Walterskirchen6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWes Haugo / Matt Munding vs Gary Carnefix / David Westphal6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBruce Hazeltine vs Brian Thrapp6-0, 6-0
2021-06-19vs Qualifying TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesWes Haugo / Matt Munding vs Thomas McLain / Ross Tillman6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanny Anslinger / Kaleb Hamilton vs Brian Thrapp / Kim Walterskirchen7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrian Clifton / Gordon Terpe vs Gary Carnefix / David Westphal6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 3.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Uncoachable30141262
2Qualifying Team0311429182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Bruce Hazeltine
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Brian Clifton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Danny Anslinger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Gordon Terpe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Glenn Moffatt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Matt Munding
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Clifton + Gordon Terpe4165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bruce Hazeltine
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Brian Clifton
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Danny Anslinger
46W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Gordon Terpe
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Glenn Moffatt
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Matt Munding
19W–0L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.