Teams

FHCS MADSEN

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-26vs MEMPK MARKLEYLost 05
L#1 DoublesMichael Bagwell / Thomas White vs Michael Blevin / Ben Lowe4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesDimas Gutierrez vs Armando Grez2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Madsen / Bernard Zipp vs Charles Duggan / Jayden Sweeny0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesEric Ringer vs David Brad Young II6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrad Claus / Darin Tiffany vs Sam O'Rourke-Lepine / Jarek Markley1-6, 1-6
2024-05-22vs LTFCS COLESLost 23
W#1 DoublesTodd Madsen / Steve Shawver vs Rob Wilson / David Kirkland6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDimas Gutierrez vs Bryan ODonnell2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Bagwell / Bernard Zipp vs Lewis Wilcox / Adam Fulmer4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJames Blackmon vs Matthew Pape6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBrad Claus / Eric Ringer vs Julio Diaz / Roderick Coles4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-08vs CSRC CARPENTERLost 05
L#1 DoublesSteve Shawver / Dimas Gutierrez vs Austin Carpenter / Zachary Carpenter6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEric Ringer vs Conner Crosby6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTodd Madsen / Brad Claus vs Michael Park / Craig Rogers2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJames Blackmon vs Michael White6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBernard Zipp / Michael Bagwell vs John Abbott / Jeffrey White5-7, 4-6
2024-05-01vs LTFCS COLESLost 23
W#1 DoublesTodd Madsen / Brad Claus vs Roderick Coles / Leon Goorabian6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEric Ringer vs Rob Wilson2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSteve Shawver / Thomas White vs David Kirkland / Julio Diaz6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJames Blackmon vs Lewis Wilcox2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Bagwell / Bernard Zipp vs Matthew Pape / Adam Fulmer4-6, 1-6
2024-04-24vs MEMPK MARKLEYLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrad Claus / Todd Madsen vs Michael Blevin / Jarek Markley0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJames Blackmon vs Charles Duggan6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichael Bagwell / Eric Ringer vs Jayden Sweeny / Cory Rogers2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSteve Shawver vs Armando Grez3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesThomas White / Bernard Zipp vs David Brad Young II / Sam O'Rourke-Lepine4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-04-17vs CSRC CARPENTERSplit 22
W#1 DoublesThomas White / Steve Shawver vs Austin Carpenter / Zachary Carpenter6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEric Ringer / Michael Bagwell vs Frank Johnson / Curt Linke4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJames Blackmon vs John Abbott6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBernard Zipp / Brad Claus vs Craig Rogers / Jeffrey White0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Thomas White
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Steve Shawver
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Bernard Zipp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Darin Tiffany
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric Ringer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
James Blackmon
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.55
Dimas Gutierrez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Brad Claus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Todd Madsen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Michael Bagwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Shawver + Thomas White5159% games+9.8% vs expected
Steve Shawver + Dimas Gutierrez4547% games−4.7% vs expected
Darin Tiffany + Steve Shawver4159% gamesnot enough data
Todd Madsen + Brad Claus2340% gamesnot enough data
Bernard Zipp + Michael Bagwell134 matchesnot enough data
Bernard Zipp + Steve Shawver213 matchesnot enough data
Bernard Zipp + Todd Madsen123 matchesnot enough data
Steve Shawver + Todd Madsen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas White
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.78
Steve Shawver
25W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Bernard Zipp
13W–23L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Darin Tiffany
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Eric Ringer
2W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
James Blackmon
12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dimas Gutierrez
9W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Brad Claus
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Todd Madsen
13W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Michael Bagwell
25W–38L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.