Teams

Conatser - April Sound

2025 NOHO MIXED 55 & Over · 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-17vs Pierce-Hard Knocks-Woodlands ParksLost 12
L#1 DoublesLayne Smith / Tammy Conatser vs Gerald Tyler / Carol Buonfiglio6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWade Leake / Mary-Anne LeBlanc vs Oscar Mejia / Melissa Hill1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Mathis / Carrie Mathis vs Timothy Pierce / Lori VanJoslin6-2, 6-2
2025-08-10vs Pierce-Hard Knocks-Woodlands ParksLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Callihan / Yvonne Callihan vs Gerald Tyler / Carol Buonfiglio4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLayne Smith / Michelle Robertson vs Kevin Whitenight / Lori VanJoslin3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesWade Leake / Mary-Anne LeBlanc vs Brian Mourino / Karen Seefeldt0-6, 4-6
2025-08-03vs Pierce-Hard Knocks-Woodlands ParksLost 03
L#1 DoublesYvonne Callihan / John Callihan vs Gerald Tyler / Carol Buonfiglio3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Mathis / Steve Mathis vs Timothy Pierce / Kristen Perkins3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLayne Smith / Tammy Conatser vs Moiz Husain / Catherine Canavan3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Carrie Mathis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Layne Smith
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary-Anne LeBlanc
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Steve Mathis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tammy Conatser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Wade Leake
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Yvonne Callihan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Mathis + Steve Mathis224 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Conatser + Layne Smith033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Mathis
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Layne Smith
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary-Anne LeBlanc
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Mathis
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Conatser
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wade Leake
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yvonne Callihan
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.