Teams

HOA-REG-Bennett/55&Over7.0W

55 & Over 7.0 & 9.0 Section Championships · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE-REG-Doghman/Johnson/55&Over7.0W000000
2IA-REG-Docherty-VandeVoorde/55&Over7.0W000000
3KS-REG-White/Ball/55&Over7.0W000000
4HOA-REG-Bennett/55&Over7.0W000000
5MO-REG-Hoffmann/55&Over7.0W000000
6OK-Reg-Hise000000
7OKWC/Steinke/55&over7.0W000000
8OKWC2-Casey-Johnston000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Delane Cohen
published 3.5
3.28
Stephanie Gunderson
published
Barbara Wood
published 3.5
3.25
Ganga Perumparambil
published
3.18
Candace Herman
published 3.5
3.07
Rhonda Gilstrap
published
3.00
Natalie Neal
published
2.59
Beth Mundhenke
published 3
Susan Ferguson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delane Cohen + Candace Herman10457% games+5.4% vs expected
Stephanie Gunderson + Barbara Wood5354% games+5.1% vs expected
Natalie Neal + Beth Mundhenke9356% games+3.8% vs expected
Rhonda Gilstrap + Susan Ferguson13656% games+2.8% vs expected
Ganga Perumparambil + Natalie Neal5258% games−0.7% vs expected
Barbara Wood + Ganga Perumparambil3249% games−3.6% vs expected
Candace Herman + Ganga Perumparambil4745% games−4.7% vs expected
Stephanie Gunderson + Candace Herman2842% games−6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Delane Cohen
107W–44L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Stephanie Gunderson
60W–59L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Wood
50W–39L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ganga Perumparambil
55W–42L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Candace Herman
117W–119L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Rhonda Gilstrap
47W–51L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Natalie Neal
45W–69L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Beth Mundhenke
31W–41L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
Susan Ferguson
41W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.