Teams

BTC:More About That Ace:Song/Tysko

2026 NCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 40 & Over 4.5 Women 1

15 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesJoanna Tysko / Christine Turner vs Michelle Bass / Julie Burdelski2-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRachel Epstein vs Lori Siegel5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesXianyuan Song / Erica Bridge vs Kristin Daley / Christina Marini4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCristina Lucin / Jacqueline Bagwell vs Nan Cunningham / Signe Breeden6-3, 7-5
W#1 DoublesErica Bridge / Joanna Tysko vs Joyce MacAinag / Jennifer MacAinag6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCarrie Silver-Bernstein vs Nan Cunningham7-5, 1-4
L#2 DoublesCristina Lucin / Leah Black vs Michelle Bass / Lauren Crowley6-7, 4-3
L#1 DoublesRachel Epstein / Christine Turner vs Kimelle McCarthy / Jennifer MacAinag2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesErica Bridge vs Tiffany Martindale6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCourtney Marum / Carrie Silver-Bernstein vs Emily Bazelon / Carolyn Carroll6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJoanna Tysko / Courtney Marum vs Jennifer Noonan / Julie Condit2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Finch vs Lori Siegel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErica Bridge / Jacqueline Bagwell vs Jennifer MacAinag / Kimelle McCarthy7-5, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeah Black / Rachel Epstein vs Lauren Crowley / Tiffany Martindale7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesErica Bridge / Joanna Tysko vs Julie Condit / Jennifer Noonan2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Finch vs Inessa Laskova2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Bagwell / Courtney Marum vs Michelle Bass / Emily Bazelon6-7, 5-3
L#3 DoublesKORI BURKHOLDER / Rachel Epstein vs Nan Cunningham / Jennifer MacAinag6-7, 5-5
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Bagwell / Erica Bridge vs Julie Condit / Jennifer Noonan4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKORI BURKHOLDER vs Julie Burdelski3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJoanna Tysko / Xianyuan Song vs Jennifer MacAinag / Joyce MacAinag0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLeah Black / Rachel Epstein vs Kristin Daley / Inessa Laskova6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 4.5 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Erica Bridge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.40
Cristina Lucin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.35
Joanna Tysko
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.22
Courtney Marum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
KORI BURKHOLDER
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.17
Jacqueline Bagwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Erica Maglieri
published
4.15
Christine Turner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Rachel Epstein
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.00
Megan Borman
published
4.00
Amy Finch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Xianyuan Song
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Carrie Silver-Bernstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Julie McNeill
published
Leah Black
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Marum + Joanna Tysko8259% games+4.4% vs expected
Erica Maglieri + Julie McNeill3451% games−4.5% vs expected
Erica Maglieri + Erica Bridge2352% games−5.1% vs expected
Erica Bridge + Jacqueline Bagwell2348% games−8.8% vs expected
Xianyuan Song + Joanna Tysko2439% games−10.6% vs expected
Cristina Lucin + Erica Bridge404 matchesnot enough data
Erica Bridge + Rachel Epstein224 matchesnot enough data
Erica Bridge + Christine Turner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Bridge
64W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Cristina Lucin
6W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
4.40
Joanna Tysko
45W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Courtney Marum
116W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
4.22
KORI BURKHOLDER
85W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.20
Jacqueline Bagwell
28W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.17
Erica Maglieri
46W–24L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Christine Turner
17W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
Rachel Epstein
149W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
Megan Borman
65W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
4.5
Amy Finch
3W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
Xianyuan Song
111W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Carrie Silver-Bernstein
33W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Julie McNeill
44W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Leah Black
17W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.