Teams

Appel

2022 Anne Arundel Adult Other Women's Day · Anne Arundel Adult Other Women's Day 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-31vs HuntingtonWon 20
W#2 DoublesHeather Nesti / Wendye Appel vs Karen Adriani / Jennifer Mcgowan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarina Anglim / Tracy Seybert vs Rise Lancoon / Karen Casey6-4, 7-6
2022-03-23vs WoffordWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Seybert / Marina Anglim vs Kim Herman / Dale Clark7-5, 6-0
2022-03-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesSophia Crawley / Tracy Seybert vs Karen Kirksey / Karen Casey6-2, 6-1
2022-03-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarina Anglim / Tracy Seybert vs Cornelia Wikar / Sherri Raimondo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-10vs HuntingtonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Coady / Heather Nesti vs Rise Lancoon / Karen Casey7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMarina Anglim / Tracy Seybert vs Jill Huntington / Yulin Henry4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-02vs WoffordWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Seybert / Marina Anglim vs Kim Herman / Cynthia Wofford6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-02-09vs WoffordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnh Le / Tracy Seybert vs Sherri Raimondo / Jennifer Sapp6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Sophia Crawley vs Kim Herman / Cornelia Wikar6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-01-27vs HuntingtonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLisa Walsh / Heather Nesti vs Jill Huntington / Karen Adriani3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSophia Crawley / DIANE CASANOVA vs Kathy Hastings / Sarah Worcester6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-19vs WoffordWon 10
W#1 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Sophia Crawley vs Kim Herman / Nancy McGee7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult Other Women's Day 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Jennifer Coady
published
3.34
Lisa Walsh
published
3.21
Tracy Seybert
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.17
Marina Anglim
published
3.14
Heather Nesti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
DIANE CASANOVA
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jessica Gibson
published
Sophia Crawley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Seybert + Marina Anglim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Coady
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Lisa Walsh
24W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Tracy Seybert
76W–40L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Marina Anglim
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Heather Nesti
180W–165L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
DIANE CASANOVA
126W–105L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.98
Jessica Gibson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sophia Crawley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.