Teams

BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 18AM4.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-07vs YMCA PRESIDIO 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesGunther Lenz / Joe Liebeschuetz vs Gen Tri / Justin Truong6-4, 6-2
2022-06-05vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AM4.0BWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / William Daniher vs William Hadaya / Scott Schafebook6-1, 6-4
2022-05-28vs PENINSULA GCC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Winston Sok Ku Cho vs Mason Ford / Michael Njo6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Philip Thomas vs David Zeng / Edward Wang6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Donald Kung vs Derrick Chua / Huan Ta7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ali Jafri
published 4.5
3.96
Joe Liebeschuetz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Philip Thomas
published
Eric Kuchherzki
published 4
3.71
Michael Lata
published
3.62
Steve Renaker
published
3.58
Marc Manuel
published
3.54
Donald Kung
published 4
3.51
Josh Levenberg
published
3.40
Kurt Kwok
published
3.36
Craig Quan
published 3.5
Alvaro Jimenez
published 3.5
Leonard Chang
published
Winston Sok Ku Cho
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ali Jafri
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Joe Liebeschuetz
96W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
Philip Thomas
26W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Eric Kuchherzki
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Lata
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Steve Renaker
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Marc Manuel
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Donald Kung
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Josh Levenberg
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
Kurt Kwok
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Craig Quan
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Alvaro Jimenez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leonard Chang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Winston Sok Ku Cho
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.