Teams

Titzer/Jones 65s 6.5 Combo W Mon AM

2024 Piedmont Combo 65 & Over · 6.5 Women 65 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesKathy Jones / Brenda Varner vs Lynn Tester / Betty Smith6-2, 7-6
2024-09-23vs Cober 65s 6.5 Combo W Mon AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrenda Varner / Cindy Lynk vs Ethel Neal / Donna Range6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKathy Jones / Brenda Varner vs Judy Eaton / Betty Smith6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesKathy Jones / Brenda Varner vs Kathy Cross / Faye Halvorsen6-4, 6-4
2024-08-05vs Cober 65s 6.5 Combo W Mon AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrenda Varner / Sue Blanchard vs Robin Smith / Susan Harvey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Christine Osteen
published 3.5
3.40
Kathy Jones
published
3.38
Cindy Lynk
published 3.5
3.28
Grace Titzer
published
3.17
Sue Blanchard
published
3.17
Teresa Dail
published
3.16
Sue Ann Lapp
published
3.03
Noreena Cole
published
2.91
Brenda Varner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Joyce Chamblee
published
2.62
Linda Shuster
published
Elizabeth Haskins
published
Fran Jones
published
Katy Vuncannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Jones + Christine Osteen12168% games+10.8% vs expected
Grace Titzer + Teresa Dail404 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Lynk + Grace Titzer303 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Lynk + Sue Ann Lapp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Osteen
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kathy Jones
27W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Cindy Lynk
11W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Grace Titzer
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Sue Blanchard
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Teresa Dail
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Sue Ann Lapp
19W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.16
Noreena Cole
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Brenda Varner
137W–87L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Joyce Chamblee
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Linda Shuster
19W–24L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
Elizabeth Haskins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Fran Jones
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katy Vuncannon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.