Teams

Addison - Shannon

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over - Women's Summer · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-16vs RCCB - RosenquistLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Shannon / Danielle Hyatt vs Mary McCarthy / Terry Taylor6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLyuda Saks / Kim Johnson vs Heather Schleicher / Terry Ann Tatro6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBritta Barnby / Katharine Polvino vs Julie Cole / Lee Harrington1-6, 1-6
2026-07-09vs Desoto - WellsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLyuda Saks / Candace Starkey vs Stacie Neff / Gena Wools3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Paternoster / Dana Saunders vs Eleanor Sheldon / Miriam Perlmutter4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBritta Barnby / Kim Johnson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-02vs Desoto - SimmonsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Paternoster / Elizabeth Shannon vs Margaret Cornell / Jessica Vega Coots0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesXu Sue Huang / Kim Johnson vs Cynthia Simmons / Jennifer Thessen5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDanielle Hyatt / Dana Saunders vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-25vs Westwind - NewellLost 03
L#1 DoublesBritta Barnby / Lyuda Saks vs Amy McIntosh / Gaylyn Woodruff0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Hyatt / Dana Saunders vs Sara Hatfield / Sherri Kidder1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCandace Starkey / JoAnne Steinberg vs Peggy Wilson / Tanya Molony1-6, 0-6
2026-06-11vs RCCB - RosenquistLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Carroll / Danielle Hyatt vs LInda Madyda / Melissa Rosenquist0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCandace Starkey / Kim Johnson vs Heather Schleicher / Heather Lawrence6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Shannon / Dana Saunders vs Marlee Miller / Lee Harrington6-4, 6-2
2026-06-04vs Desoto - WellsLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Shannon / Katharine Polvino vs Deborah Phillips / Shelly Rosseau3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLyuda Saks / Kim Johnson vs Susan Noble / Tina Amburgey3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Hyatt / Dana Saunders vs Eleanor Sheldon / Miriam Perlmutter4-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs Desoto - SimmonsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Johnson / Candace Starkey vs Liz Donnelly / Jessica Shinn4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBritta Barnby / Dana Saunders vs Gillian Dionne / Jessica Vega Coots1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Hyatt / JoAnne Steinberg vs Kelly Sabel / Stephanie McIntosh1-6, 1-6
2026-05-14vs Westwind - NewellLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Shannon / Candace Starkey vs Edie Newell / Debbie Sibley3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Hyatt / Dana Saunders vs Amy McIntosh / Gaylyn Woodruff3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLyuda Saks / Britta Barnby vs Sherri Kidder / Becky Press5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Donna Paternoster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Elizabeth Shannon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Danielle Hyatt
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Lyuda Saks
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Dana Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kim Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Xu Sue Huang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Candace Starkey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Britta Barnby
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.86
JoAnne Steinberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katharine Polvino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Hyatt + Dana Saunders2545% games+3.6% vs expected
Danielle Hyatt + Elizabeth Shannon5259% games+0.3% vs expected
Lyuda Saks + Kim Johnson224 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Hyatt + Donna Paternoster123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Paternoster
82W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Elizabeth Shannon
10W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Danielle Hyatt
65W–82L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Lyuda Saks
88W–77L career · 8 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Dana Saunders
11W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kim Johnson
10W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Xu Sue Huang
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Candace Starkey
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Britta Barnby
28W–77L career · 5 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
JoAnne Steinberg
30W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
Katharine Polvino
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim Carroll
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.