Teams

MPRC-Daigneault

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 2.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Pearl Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.33
Julia Daigneault
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Results6 ties
2025-06-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesPearl Dixon vs Yasmine Foroud6-3, 6-4
2025-06-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesPearl Dixon / Julia Daigneault vs Prineet Pottmeyer / Katalin Wiggins6-1, 6-1
2025-06-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesPearl Dixon vs Heather Davidson6-2, 6-2
2025-05-17Split 11
W#1 DoublesXizhen Palmer / Pearl Dixon vs Elizabeth Fox / Shelby Tweto6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulia Daigneault / Aquila Hussain vs Kathleen Brenneman / Harshi Waters6-1, 6-2
2025-05-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulia Daigneault / Anna Simonsen vs Michelle Walker / Heather Long6-2, 6-1
2025-03-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCrispin Wong / Pearl Dixon vs Skye Larsen / Ariana Tunmore6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Pearl Dixon
23W–23L career
1%98%2%
2.80
2.5
Julia Daigneault
15W–29L career
0%83%17%
2.33

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.