← Teams

THPRD-Blebea/Lee

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
NANDA SIDDAIAH
published 4
3.81
Agus Rusli
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.50
John Yu
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Angelina Warriner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.40
Edmund Yuan
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.37
Vivian Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Chiharu Olsson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Craig Putnam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Rosie Francis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Kirk Planck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Alison Marr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.70
Diana Blebea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-03-12Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Vicino / Kirk Planck vs Sheldon Sun / Helen Chen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Alison Marr vs Jill Boyce / Rajan Madhusudan7-5, 6-3
2023-03-04Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChiharu Olsson / Agus Rusli vs Barbara Gram / Chresten Gram6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRosie Francis / NANDA SIDDAIAH vs Sara Crate / John Nee6-2, 6-0
2023-02-25Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesNANDA SIDDAIAH / Rosie Francis vs Mark Bernazzani / Karen Pickering6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCraig Putnam / Tonya Halog vs Matt Savage / Heather Watkins7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKirk Planck / Diana Blebea vs Robin Burak / Kevin Muck6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-02-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChiharu Olsson / Agus Rusli vs Matt Savage / Heather Watkins6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Vicino / John Yu vs Joe Trachta / Alana Rhea6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Vivian Nguyen vs Sean McKinnie / Karen Pickering7-5, 6-1
2023-02-04Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChiharu Olsson / Agus Rusli vs Nancy Korenek-Leveque / Jaime Aranda-Michel6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKirk Planck / Angelina Warriner vs Shella Razon-Lumetta / Troy Johnston7-5, 6-0
2023-01-29Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesJohn Yu / Vivian Nguyen vs Sebastian Llados Vila / Lyudmila Leissler7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobert Truong / Alison Marr vs Stefano Cavallucci / Cathleen Lang7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCraig Putnam / Angelina Warriner vs Mark Muckerheide / Cheryl Geisler6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames Lawrence / Alison Marr vs Donna Baxter / Ray Baxter6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Blebea / John Yu vs Josh Belzman / Katrina Heiles6-4, 6-3
2023-01-07Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKirk Planck / Angelina Warriner vs Kerry Tymchuk / Kaoru Nelson6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Vivian Nguyen vs Octavian Tudorache / Anna Boyarshinova6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
NANDA SIDDAIAH
69W–31L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Agus Rusli
178W–86L career
0%99%1%
3.81
4
John Yu
136W–65L career
32%68%0%
3.50
4
Angelina Warriner
91W–55L career
37%63%0%
3.49
3.5
Edmund Yuan
113W–86L career
0%96%4%
3.40
3.5
Vivian Nguyen
178W–99L career
0%98%2%
3.37
3.5
Chiharu Olsson
48W–47L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Craig Putnam
20W–11L career · type M
not enough data
—
3.5
Rosie Francis
22W–10L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kirk Planck
91W–71L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3.5
Alison Marr
70W–50L career
18%81%0%
3.10
3
Diana Blebea
90W–67L career
3%97%0%
2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.