Teams

Skinner- Creighton Farms

2025 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-14vs Haugh - StoneleighWon 10
W#2 SinglesKelly Rowley vs Jessica Saleck6-1, 6-1
2025-10-07vs Marple - Ace and GraceLost 01
L#2 SinglesSarah Eickelberg vs Kim Hovda7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-06vs Marple - Ace and GraceWon 20
W#1 SinglesAllison Quinly vs Suzanne Clegg6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Rowley vs Tricia Hodnett2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-02vs Haugh - StoneleighWon 10
W#1 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Jessica Saleck6-1, 6-1
2025-09-16vs Marple - Ace and GraceSplit 11
W#1 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Yasmeen Sana Warsi7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesSarah Eickelberg vs Jill Vaughan0-6, 2-6
2025-09-11vs Haugh - StoneleighWon 20
W#1 SinglesAllison Quinly vs Patricia Yriart6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKelly Rowley vs Jessica Saleck6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Stacy Mowry
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Allison Quinly
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Kelly Rowley
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Sarah Eickelberg
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.65
Sara Jane Sherry
published
2.40
Ella Rash
published
Jennie Simpson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Eickelberg + Allison Quinly9361% games+14.8% vs expected
Stacy Mowry + Allison Quinly7166% games+13.6% vs expected
Kelly Rowley + Stacy Mowry9062% games+10.8% vs expected
Kelly Rowley + Sarah Eickelberg3254% games+0.9% vs expected
Sarah Eickelberg + Stacy Mowry6163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacy Mowry
86W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
3.5
Allison Quinly
50W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Kelly Rowley
65W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3
Sarah Eickelberg
51W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Sara Jane Sherry
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Ella Rash
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Jennie Simpson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.