Teams

KY/LOU/SRINIVASAN

2025 USTA FALL 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-12-13vs KY/LOU/RENDALost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Mehaffey / Paul Jordan vs Mike Jackson / Michael Bliss6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-12-13vs KY/LOU/CLEGG/SWOPEWon 21
W#1 DoublesL Srinivasan / Howard Wagner vs Troy Johnson / Miles Harvey6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesWilliam Hawes vs David Biddle2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPravin Kukkala / Schu Montgomery vs Andy Burch / Dean Hedges1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-12-07vs KY/LOU/RENDAWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Powers / Scott Warner vs Ryan Saxton / Mike Jackson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-12-07vs KY/LOU/GIE/WISSINGWon 30
W#1 DoublesL Srinivasan / John Bryerton vs Gung-Min Gie / Michael Weisberg6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRodrigo Moreno vs Samuel McClain6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Hawes / William Vander Meer vs Eric Elliott / Michael Dees6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-23vs KY/LOU/POWERSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDoug Bone / Pravin Kukkala vs Michael Vickers / Dean Terrell2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesL Srinivasan / Scott Warner vs Justin Powers / Brad Cunningham6-4, 6-2
2025-11-16vs KY/LOU/MIKEWon 30
W#1 DoublesHoward Wagner / Rodrigo Moreno vs Brian Warren / Matthew Ferreri6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSchu Montgomery vs Jason Bigg7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHal Kara / Doug Bone vs Tim Kelley / Scott Tyler6-2, 6-3
2025-11-08vs KY/LOU/RENDAWon 20
W#1 DoublesHoward Wagner / John Bryerton vs Amal Agarwal / Andrew Renda6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesL Srinivasan / Schu Montgomery vs Matt Lare / Joseph Waterman6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-11-02vs KY/LOU/CLEGG/SWOPELost 12
W#1 DoublesHoward Wagner / Rodrigo Moreno vs Glenn Flood / Troy Johnson7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSchu Montgomery vs Ben Birkby0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPravin Kukkala / William Vander Meer vs Joshua Jevne / Andy Burch3-6, 4-6
2025-10-25vs KY/LOU/RENDAWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Warner / Ryan Engelbrecht vs Kiran Palla / Matt Lare6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-25vs KY/LOU/GIE/WISSINGLost 03
L#1 DoublesHoward Wagner / Ray Ottman vs Gung-Min Gie / Todd Mehaffey5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Hawes vs Michael Smolinski7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Jordan / Pravin Kukkala vs James Fox / Michael Dees1-6, 5-7
2025-10-19vs KY/LOU/POWERSLost 03
L#1 DoublesL Srinivasan / John Bryerton vs Mitchell McCoy / Michael Vickers6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWilliam Hawes vs Andreas Wokutch6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDoug Bone / William Vander Meer vs Ryan Engelbrecht / Dean Terrell4-6, 4-6
2025-10-11vs KY/LOU/MIKELost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Warner / Hal Kara vs Scott Tyler / Mike Kreis4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesWilliam Hawes vs Jason Bigg3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Bone / Paul Jordan vs Chris Mike / Terence Gordon1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Scott Warner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Hal Kara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Howard Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
L Srinivasan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.34
Rodrigo Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.31
John Bryerton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
William Vander Meer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Schu Montgomery
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Paul Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Doug Bone
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Pravin Kukkala
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ray Ottman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Hawes
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Howard Wagner + L Srinivasan5257% games+3.9% vs expected
L Srinivasan + Scott Warner404 matchesnot enough data
Rodrigo Moreno + Howard Wagner303 matchesnot enough data
Doug Bone + Paul Jordan033 matchesnot enough data
Doug Bone + Scott Warner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Warner
44W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Hal Kara
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Howard Wagner
23W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
L Srinivasan
24W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Rodrigo Moreno
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
John Bryerton
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
William Vander Meer
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Schu Montgomery
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Paul Jordan
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Doug Bone
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pravin Kukkala
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ray Ottman
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
William Hawes
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.