Teams

Kings Charter Ramser

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-14vs HCC StinsonLost 01
L#1 SinglesMichelle Jepson vs Kandace McGinnis2-6, 1-6
2023-06-09vs TDC BakerSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMichelle Jepson vs Melanie Eccard4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Loyde / Susan Staton vs Leslie Baker / Susan Derco6-3, 7-6
2023-06-02vs WOCC MoehlingWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatricia Loyde / Susan Staton vs Blair Burford / Liz Benedetti3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-31vs Raintree LloydLost 01
L#2 SinglesSusan Staton vs Megan Lloyd1-6, 4-6
2023-05-24vs Twin Hickory YuWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatricia Loyde / Susan Staton vs Amy Buckberg / Penny Kivett6-2, 6-0
2023-05-19vs ACAC NaylorLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrenda Tyson / Susan Staton vs Julie Rison / Kim Smith2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Michelle Jepson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Brenda Tyson
published 3.5
3.22
Victoria Galiffa
published
3.11
Cheryl Woodward
published 3.5
3.10
Patricia Loyde
published
3.02
Donna Mourtzakis
published
2.94
Mary Spagnolo
published
2.92
April Titler
published 3
2.78
Susan Staton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.46
Cheryl Koenig
published 3
Mary Thumma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Staton + Michelle Jepson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Jepson
129W–103L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brenda Tyson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Galiffa
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Cheryl Woodward
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Patricia Loyde
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Donna Mourtzakis
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Mary Spagnolo
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
April Titler
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
Susan Staton
130W–142L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Cheryl Koenig
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.46
Mary Thumma
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.