Teams

Meekins - RS Hard

2026 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-17vs Torgersen - RS HardWon 31
W#1 DoublesJoseph Tegenkamp / ChanD Tegenkamp vs Jack Pouchert / Mason Barnes6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRobert Landt vs Alex Kiefer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMason Rhone / Ethan Rhone vs Karlis Draulis / Anthony Mazzurco6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesXiaobo Dong vs Reid Torgersen1-6, 6-7
2026-06-10vs Link - RS ClayWon 32
L#1 DoublesZach Pohlmann / Jack Bellah vs Vladimir Asparuhov / Jim Smith5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDean Hotz vs Rick Bucco6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoseph Tegenkamp / John Haarala vs Jaymes Tran / Jason Twigg6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRobert Landt vs Jonathan Llanera6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesXiaobo Dong / Ethan Rhone vs Bradford Grimmel / Jody Link6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-20vs Link - RS ClayWon 41
L#1 DoublesMatthew Meekins / Robert Landt vs Vladimir Asparuhov / Jonathan Llanera7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJack Bellah vs Jason Twigg6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoseph Tegenkamp / Xiaobo Dong vs Bradford Grimmel / Brian Young6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDean Hotz vs Rick Bucco6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Haarala / Ethan Rhone vs Jaymes Tran / Stephen Rose6-1, 6-4
2026-05-13vs Torgersen - RS HardWon 50
W#1 DoublesMason Rhone / John Haarala vs Jonathan Green / Alex Kiefer6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesZach Pohlmann vs Brooks Steber6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Tegenkamp / Xiaobo Dong vs Reid Torgersen / Mason Barnes6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMatthew Meekins vs Jack Pouchert6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Davis / Dean Hotz vs Carroll Papajohn / Robert Schroth6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Joseph Tegenkamp
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
John Haarala
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Ethan Rhone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Robert Landt
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Dean Hotz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Zach Pohlmann
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
ChanD Tegenkamp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jack Bellah
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
James Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Xiaobo Dong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Mason Rhone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Meekins
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Xiaobo Dong + Joseph Tegenkamp4165% gamesnot enough data
Xiaobo Dong + Jack Bellah303 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Tegenkamp + ChanD Tegenkamp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Tegenkamp
13W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.04
John Haarala
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Ethan Rhone
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Robert Landt
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Dean Hotz
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.91
Zach Pohlmann
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
ChanD Tegenkamp
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Jack Bellah
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
James Davis
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Xiaobo Dong
24W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Mason Rhone
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Meekins
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.