Teams

Negron

2026 FW Combo Tournament · 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-24vs LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesJose Andrade / Matt Chehab vs Rick Meisel / Michael Love6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRicardo Negron / Kul Shekhar vs Brian Ownby / Blake Halpern1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesColby Hudson / Allan Wilson vs Bryan Disney / Tarun Nadimpalli2-6, 3-6
2026-05-23vs LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesEdgar Ayala / Daniel Zamora vs Rick Meisel / Blake Halpern1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKul Shekhar / Colby Hudson vs Bobby Reeves / Michael Love2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Chehab / Ricardo Negron vs Brian Ownby / Tarun Nadimpalli5-7, 3-6
2026-05-23vs LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesEdgar Ayala / Matt Chehab vs Landon Love / Tarun Nadimpalli1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllan Wilson / Daniel Zamora vs Rick Meisel / Blake Halpern2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRicardo Negron / Jose Andrade vs Bryan Disney / Bobby Reeves1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Love3081245
2Negron03181699

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Jose Andrade
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Kul Shekhar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Edgar Ayala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Allan Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Ricardo Negron
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Matt Chehab
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Colby Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Daniel Zamora
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ricardo Negron + Kul Shekhar2342% games−7.1% vs expected
Ricardo Negron + Jose Andrade314 matchesnot enough data
Colby Hudson + Allan Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Ricardo Negron + Edgar Ayala123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jose Andrade
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Kul Shekhar
27W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.72
Edgar Ayala
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Allan Wilson
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Ricardo Negron
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Matt Chehab
20W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Colby Hudson
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Daniel Zamora
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.