Teams

PD55/WORRELL/FTC

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over - PD · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-01vs PD55/Askins/HCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMeg Brunson / Nancy Moore vs Lynda Owens / Kathy Brown6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth McLean / Laura Floyd vs Terrie Reames / Deborah Griggs0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesEvelyn Goforth / Karen Worrell vs Jane Ponder / Anita Crawford6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-25vs PD 3.0W 55 & Over (Weinberg)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRobin Downing / Karen Worrell vs Bonnie Disney / Denise Weeks1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Brunson / Lorraine Tindal vs Pamela Cody / Melvina Chappell6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Stedman / Julieanne Yarnal vs Jill McMillan / Pamela Weinberg6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-11vs PD55/Askins/HCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeg Brunson / Lorraine Tindal vs Jane Ponder / Marla Prozzi6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobin Downing / Evelyn Goforth vs Deborah Griggs / Terrie Reames6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Perkins / Kathleen Stedman vs Anita Crawford / Betsy Kraus6-1, 7-5
2026-03-04vs PD 3.0W 55 & Over (Weinberg)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMeg Brunson / Lorraine Tindal vs Mary Lynn Lee / Elena Claus6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Worrell / Nancy Huggins vs Pamela Weinberg / Pamela Cody5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEvelyn Goforth / Robin Downing vs Melvina Chappell / Denise Weeks7-5, 6-3
2026-02-18vs PD55/Askins/HCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Goforth / Lorraine Tindal vs Kathy Brown / Lynda Owens3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Brunson / Julieanne Yarnal vs Susan Brown / Terrie Reames0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Worrell / Laura Floyd vs Allyne Askins / Barbara Lee2-6, 3-6
2026-02-07vs PD 3.0W 55 & Over (Weinberg)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMeg Brunson / Julieanne Yarnal vs Elena Claus / Mary Lynn Lee3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Downing / Kristen Perkins vs Pamela Cody / Pamela Weinberg3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Floyd / Lorraine Tindal vs Bonnie Disney / Jean Mcintosh6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PD 3.0W 55 & Over (Weinberg)5112616153
2PD55/Askins/HCC3310819174
3PD55/WORRELL/FTC1551326181

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Kathleen Stedman
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.76
Nancy Moore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Julieanne Yarnal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Meg Brunson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.64
Evelyn Goforth
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.62
Lorraine Tindal
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.59
Sandra Hathorn
published
2.56
Nancy Huggins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Kristen Perkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Beth Dynan
published 3
2.44
Robin Downing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Elizabeth McLean
published
2.41
Laura Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Denise King
published 2.5
2.16
Karen Worrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Janet Sims
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorraine Tindal + Meg Brunson3258% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Stedman + Julieanne Yarnal224 matchesnot enough data
Evelyn Goforth + Karen Worrell033 matchesnot enough data
Evelyn Goforth + Laura Floyd213 matchesnot enough data
Julieanne Yarnal + Meg Brunson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Stedman
13W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Nancy Moore
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Julieanne Yarnal
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Meg Brunson
9W–15L career · 10 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Evelyn Goforth
5W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Lorraine Tindal
26W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
Sandra Hathorn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
2.59
Nancy Huggins
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kristen Perkins
13W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
Beth Dynan
14W–13L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Robin Downing
19W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Elizabeth McLean
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Laura Floyd
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.41
2.5
Denise King
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Worrell
2W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Janet Sims
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.