Teams

CDTA S M407.0 1HF Parks Tues 7 $22

CDTA 1Summer Mixed 40 & over · CDTA 40 & Over 7.0 Mixed Summer

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-22Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Huffaker / Jeffrey Lu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathie Melean / Andrew Pappas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMichelle Parks / Brian Barker vs Mio Dahlquist / Todd Dahlquist2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Young / Atwood Burns vs Yukiko Juretic / Matt Newman4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJerome Thymes / Kathie Melean vs Mika Nomura / Yoshitaka Nakahara1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesGeri Harston / Jerome Thymes vs Emmanuel Antonio / DANIELLE ARENDS3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDave Hecker / Michelle Parks vs Michael Smith / Mandy Shaw6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShelley Young / Steve Blaha vs Geoffrey Stone / Elizabeth Cassier4-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAllycn Grcevic / Steve Blaha vs Thomas Strickler / Bridget Draz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAtwood Burns / Jessica Barnes vs Lisa Ventrella / Andrew Dryden6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Parks / Brian Barker vs Cherie Vick / Thomas Kent6-3, 5-4
L#1 DoublesDave Hecker / Michelle Parks vs Jennifer Burnette / Dan Burnette3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJerome Thymes / Geri Harston vs Emanuele Lucente / Dorothy Kula6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Stroede / Andrew Pappas vs Melissa Maderia / Parker Turnipseed6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAndrew Pappas / Jessica Barnes vs Rick Spurgeon / Sue Christianson2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAtwood Burns / Allycn Grcevic vs Paul Leyderman / Vicki Tickman6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Lu / Jennifer Huffaker vs William Strickley / Dagmara Kolesnichenko6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA 40 & Over 7.0 Mixed Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M407.0 5Forest View Dahlquist Sun 9 $235113512133
2CDTA S M407.0 1HF Parks Tues 7 $224211717130
3CDTA S M407.0 2Score Thompson Thu 7:30 $204210818160
4CDTA S M407.0 3Berens (OUT) Mountcastle Sun 10 $223310818135
5CDTA S M407.0 7MT Bann (OUT) Koliatsis Tue 6:30 $27339920153
6CDTA S M407.0 4Tam Lam Fri 7 $222461227179
7CDTA S M407.0 6Centennial Mesh Wed 7 $200641428181

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Jennifer Huffaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Steve Blaha
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Allycn Grcevic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Andrew Pappas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Kathie Melean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Atwood Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Geri Harston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Brian Barker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.78
Dave Hecker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jeffrey Lu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jerome Thymes
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Stroede
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Parks
published
Shelley Young
published
Tom Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Pappas + Kathie Melean231654% games+2.5% vs expected
Allycn Grcevic + Atwood Burns8651% games−3.6% vs expected
Jennifer Huffaker + Jeffrey Lu5456% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Parks + Steve Blaha6253% gamesnot enough data
Kathie Melean + Atwood Burns4452% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Pappas + Laura Stroede3359% gamesnot enough data
Atwood Burns + Geri Harston4169% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Pappas + Allycn Grcevic314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Huffaker
113W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Steve Blaha
66W–63L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Allycn Grcevic
148W–127L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrew Pappas
142W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Kathie Melean
90W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Atwood Burns
89W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Geri Harston
23W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Brian Barker
11W–15L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Dave Hecker
9W–7L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Jeffrey Lu
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jerome Thymes
31W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Stroede
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Parks
45W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Young
80W–56L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Ward
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.