Teams

Owens/Backus/LR

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
William Hawkins
published
2.84
Pete Owens
published
2.77
Kim Backus
published
Bill Barnes
published 3
James DePriest
published 3
2.58
Tim Gunter
published
2.55
John Bakalekos
published
John Andrews
published
Paul Valentin-Stone
published
Ricky Holder
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Hawkins
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Pete Owens
17W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Kim Backus
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Bill Barnes
4W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
James DePriest
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Gunter
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
John Bakalekos
8W–18L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
John Andrews
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Valentin-Stone
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ricky Holder
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.