Teams

LFEM-Emerzian/Westport

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 6.5 Women 40s

15 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 9:30 AM
Bailey Road Park Tennis Court Complex
Sep 21 11:00 AM
The Club at Westport
Sep 28 9:30 AM
Bailey Road Park Tennis Court Complex
Oct 5 9:30 AM
The Club at Westport
Oct 12 9:30 AM
Fran EmerzianBarbara Minor
Oct 19 9:30 AM
vs N/A
Fran EmerzianBarbara Minor
2026-08-31vs LRSI-Sica/Sheheen/TrumpLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Buaron / Susan Ghirsig vs Erin Finn / Lisa Pagano2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Dlugosz / Carolyn Auten vs Llnon North / Wendy Lawson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHolly Reiter / DIANE FIORE vs Ann Baker / Julie Modrak6-4, 6-4
2026-08-24vs LMLA-Laliberte/CSDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Dlugosz / Debra Turner vs Janice Ingram / Monaliza Onia3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Jones / Barbara Minor vs Christin Darnell / Carol Cousins6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHolly Reiter / Kelly Greffin vs Renee Brooks / Beverly Harrah3-6, 3-6
2026-08-17vs LBBA-Barber-Pensler/EdgemoorLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Buaron / DIANE FIORE vs Sheila Pensler / Bethany Barber6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Jones / Joan Peterson vs Sallie Cune / Katherine Karnatz1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Ghirsig / Carolyn Auten vs Brenda Kadlecik / Darlene Scripter0-6, 0-6
2026-08-10vs LKGi-Gibson/Westport 6.5 40+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Dlugosz / Barbara Minor vs Brenda Clay / Laura Gallapis4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Jones / Fran Emerzian vs KJ Gibson / Caroline Raynor1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Reiter / Debra Turner vs Sheila Chast / Vicki Weber4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5 Women 40s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LMLA-Laliberte/CSD2051328
2LBBA-Barber-Pensler/Edgemoor2051329
3LRSI-Sica/Sheheen/Trump2051335
4LAWA-Wages/RR2051335
5LKGi-Gibson/Westport 6.5 40+1030017
6LKGR-Grathwohl/RR Wildcats1030013
7LHHU-Hughes/JETTON1021432
8LDST-Stamey-Reimann/SCC1142451
9LSBE-Beardslee/Westport1142545
10LSTH-Theisen/Jetton1133760
11LWGO-Goodwin/NMP 6.5 Mon 40+1124852
12LJFR-Frye-Pangilinan/NS1124856
13LMRO-Romley-Bartolucci/Jetton000000
14LCJO-Johnson/Bailey 40+ 6.5 Tues pm0112430
15LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook0103637
16LKCA-Carvelli-Resener/Jetton0103636
17LLAL-Allen-Telling/Jetton02241065
18LCSC-Schmiedel/VR CSD SPARTAN PK02151171
19LKCO-Cooper-James/Peninsula02151172
20LFEM-Emerzian/Westport02061271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Kathy Buaron
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Emily Jones
published 3.5
3.10
Linda Dlugosz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Zergun Golan
published
2.77
Holly Reiter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Julie McConnell
published
Barbara Minor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Fran Emerzian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
DIANE FIORE
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Debra Turner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Susan Ghirsig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Carolyn Auten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Joan Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.97
Kelly Greffin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
M R Kielbasa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Reiter + DIANE FIORE5456% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Greffin + DIANE FIORE123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathy Buaron
183W–148L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Emily Jones
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Linda Dlugosz
33W–38L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Zergun Golan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Holly Reiter
35W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Julie McConnell
11W–13L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Barbara Minor
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Fran Emerzian
37W–56L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
DIANE FIORE
67W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Debra Turner
1W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Susan Ghirsig
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.56
3
Carolyn Auten
1W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Joan Peterson
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Kelly Greffin
12W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
M R Kielbasa
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.