Teams

Buckhorn Us Again/Seitzinger

2026 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-24vs Cheval The Tri-Anythings/HayesLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Helme / Joshua West vs Dennis Wright / Gregory Perpetua1-2
L#3 DoublesLuis Tur / CARLOS Ramirez vs Matthew David / Kenneth Sallings3-6, 2-6
2026-08-16vs Cheval The Tri-Anythings/HayesLost 03
L#1 DoublesThach Dinh / Richard Helme vs Denny Windgassen / Patrick Greenwood1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRaymond Jozwiak / Josh Bohnart vs Amer Aldeen / Leo Dorbad4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLuis Tur / Felipe Burrego vs Matthew David / Nicholas Kitchen3-6, 3-6
2026-08-09vs Cheval The Tri-Anythings/HayesLost 03
L#1 DoublesLance Hill / Samuel Hughes vs Denny Windgassen / Dennis Wright0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua West / Hansil Kalaria vs Charles Constantine / Todd Abrams6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLuis Tur / CARLOS Ramirez vs Michel Berger / Kenneth Sallings2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-26vs Cheval The Tri-Anythings/HayesLost 12
W#1 DoublesRaymond Jozwiak / Derek DeBrocke vs Charles Constantine / Matthew Hayes6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThach Dinh / Lance Hill vs Gregory Perpetua / Dennis Wright4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCARLOS Ramirez / Luis Tur vs Kenneth Sallings / Nicholas Kitchen3-6, 5-7
2026-07-19vs Cheval The Tri-Anythings/HayesWon 21
L#1 DoublesManav Rattan / Derek DeBrocke vs Leo Dorbad / Denny Windgassen0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesThach Dinh / Hansil Kalaria vs Amer Aldeen / Gregory Perpetua6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLuis Tur / CARLOS Ramirez vs Matthew David / Michel Berger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-12vs Cheval The Tri-Anythings/HayesLost 02
L#1 DoublesRaymond Jozwiak / Richard Helme vs Patrick Greenwood / Denny Windgassen0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLuis Tur / Felipe Burrego vs Nicholas Kitchen / Kenneth Sallings1-6, 0-6
2026-06-28vs Cheval The Tri-Anythings/HayesLost 03
L#1 DoublesThach Dinh / Trenton Jones vs Denny Windgassen / Amer Aldeen5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRaymond Jozwiak / Hansil Kalaria vs Matthew Hayes / Todd Abrams2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCARLOS Ramirez / Keith Barrett vs Matthew David / Michel Berger2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cheval The Tri-Anythings/Hayes51153899
2Buckhorn Us Again/Seitzinger1531533207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
David Hennessee
published 4.5
4.02
Trenton Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Thach Dinh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Joshua West
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Lance Hill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Gregory Betza
published 4
3.74
Hansil Kalaria
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Richard Helme
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Manav Rattan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Raymond Jozwiak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Samuel Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Derek DeBrocke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Josh Bohnart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Felipe Burrego
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
CARLOS Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Keith Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Luis Tur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luis Tur + CARLOS Ramirez3640% games+0.7% vs expected
Joshua West + Hansil Kalaria213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Hennessee
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Trenton Jones
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
Thach Dinh
36W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Joshua West
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
Lance Hill
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Gregory Betza
6W–13L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Hansil Kalaria
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Richard Helme
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.72
Manav Rattan
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Raymond Jozwiak
5W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Samuel Hughes
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.62
4
Derek DeBrocke
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Josh Bohnart
17W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Felipe Burrego
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
CARLOS Ramirez
11W–14L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
Keith Barrett
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.31
Luis Tur
8W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.