Teams

NJ SILVER

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.89 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-19vs DTC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharlene Bailey / Brant Lahnert vs Rachel Heise / Samuel Tessler7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoe Hendricks / Anne Steputis vs Frank Daidone / Catherine Safieddine2-6, 2-6
2024-05-18vs WP BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesDarcie Coy / Alexander Manwaring vs Kim Chen / Virgil Nunan4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharlene Bailey / Joe Hendricks vs Megan Davis / Raul Uribe6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-05-11vs CACM REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrant Lahnert / Charlene Bailey vs Kendall Lin / Jessica Pohl7-5, 6-3
2024-05-05vs CP BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesBrant Lahnert / Crystal Campbell Messer vs Brandon Solari / Gabriela Flora4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-21vs GPTC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoe Hendricks / Charlene Bailey vs Jacob Toffler / Pallavi Marulasiddappa2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlexander Manwaring / Anne Steputis vs Sam Granberry / Jessica Lee2-6, 3-6
2024-04-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlexander Manwaring / Charlene Bailey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Brant Lahnert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.02
Anne Steputis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Charlene Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.85
Joe Hendricks
published
3.84
Darcie Coy
published 4
3.73
Anne Pielage
published 4
3.69
Alexander Manwaring
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.37
3.19
Brian Messer
published 3.5
Leigh Hebert
published
Wayne Williamson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlene Bailey + Brant Lahnert11656% games−4.8% vs expected
Crystal Campbell Messer + Brian Messer2540% games−8.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brant Lahnert
108W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
4.08
4
Anne Steputis
115W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Crystal Campbell Messer
132W–81L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Charlene Bailey
129W–101L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
Joe Hendricks
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Darcie Coy
85W–59L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Anne Pielage
23W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Alexander Manwaring
44W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Sandra Lucero Jacquez
27W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Brian Messer
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.19
Leigh Hebert
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wayne Williamson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.