Teams

LEBTC BLUE

2022 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-14vs WP GREENLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesTori Ciucci-Walley / Valeria Barton vs Laura Wasserman / Rachel Williams4-6, 1-6
2022-06-30vs PH GREENLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesMeg Yon / Tori Ciucci-Walley vs Laura Kane / Kara Robbins4-6, 0-6
L#1 Female SinglesVanessa Parsons vs Lina Politano3-6, 6-7
2022-06-23vs WP GREENLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesMeg Yon / Valeria Barton vs Laura Wasserman / Audrey Hamilton3-6, 2-6
L#1 Female SinglesVanessa Parsons vs Erica Nollen2-6, 4-6
L#2 Female SinglesMarlyse Aguirre vs Megan Gunden4-6, 4-6
2022-06-16vs NJ REDSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesAlice Kustusch / Valeria Barton vs Natalie Schaefer / Molly Myers3-6, 1-6
W#1 Female SinglesVanessa Parsons vs Joy Hicks6-2, 6-0
2022-06-09vs PH GREENLost 01
L#2 Female SinglesMarlyse Aguirre vs Kara Robbins2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Marlyse Aguirre
usually #2 Female Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Kayley Green
published
3.25
Vanessa Parsons
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Meg Yon
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Valeria Barton
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Alice Kustusch
published
Tori Ciucci-Walley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kayley Green + Meg Yon6451% games−1.2% vs expected
Kayley Green + Tori Ciucci-Walley123 matchesnot enough data
Tori Ciucci-Walley + Meg Yon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marlyse Aguirre
115W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
Kayley Green
21W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Vanessa Parsons
58W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Irene Serrano Delgado
25W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Meg Yon
28W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Valeria Barton
21W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Alice Kustusch
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tori Ciucci-Walley
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.