Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW8.5B

2023 COMBO · Women 8.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Laura Derian
published
4.23
Nicole Goridkov
published
4.16
Lena Larionova
published
4.11
Noriko Swanson
published
4.06
Martha Matrisian
published
4.05
Donna Himenez
published 4
3.96
Jennie Kessinger
published
3.96
Julianne Gee
published
3.93
Marcy Sharafian
published
3.89
Euna Roh
published 4
3.89
Nancy Wilson
published
3.88
Gily Meir
published 4
3.82
Devon Brodhead
published 4
3.79
Shari Mcaneney
published
3.71
Babe Franey
published 4
3.66
Rebecca Perez
published
3.65
Sally McKay
published
3.50
Violeta Franco
published
3.50
Ning Docena
published
2.94
Somi Lim
published
Katie Hetrick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devon Brodhead + Gily Meir13555% games+1.7% vs expected
Euna Roh + Somi Lim314 matchesnot enough data
Donna Himenez + Nancy Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Derian
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
Nicole Goridkov
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
Lena Larionova
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.16
Noriko Swanson
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
Martha Matrisian
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Donna Himenez
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
4.05
Jennie Kessinger
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.96
Julianne Gee
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.96
Marcy Sharafian
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Euna Roh
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
Nancy Wilson
19W–27L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.89
4
Gily Meir
24W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Devon Brodhead
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Shari Mcaneney
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Babe Franey
15W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Rebecca Perez
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
Sally McKay
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.65
Violeta Franco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Ning Docena
13W–26L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Somi Lim
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%0%
2.94
Katie Hetrick
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.