Teams

LDNewman/Szilagyi/NMP

2023 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-01vs LSClancy/Edgemoor ParkWon 32
W#1 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Diane Dreffer vs Barbara Kosior / Diane Pfeil6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPhebby Benton vs Jessica Benningfield6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebbie Newman / Jane Ravey vs Annie Edenfield / Buket Boucher4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAna Endsjo vs Llnon North6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnya Balcerzak / Ming Keadle vs Filomena Ferri / Karime Jankauskas3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-04-24vs LDUpchurch/CSDWon 31
W#1 DoublesMorgan Hawk / Michelle Potuzak vs Donna Upchurch / Patty Smith6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAna Endsjo vs Paige Mcguirk3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKirsty Donaldson-Roach / Ming Keadle vs Suzy Cedrone / Monica Galloway7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesPhebby Benton vs Elizabeth Mangano6-3, 6-2
2023-04-17vs LTPersinger/JettonWon 40
W#1 SinglesPhebby Benton vs LeiLei Peng6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKirsty Donaldson-Roach / Ming Keadle vs Brooke Hondros / Karen Ray6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAna Endsjo vs Jennifer Ross6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Potuzak / Julie Mudge vs Tracie Persinger / Alison Siebold6-1, 6-1
2023-04-04vs LTDudan/JettonWon 31
W#1 DoublesAna Endsjo / Mary Kennedy vs Barbara Moore / Jennifer Mautz6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJanet Szilagyi vs Meredith Ortiz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Newman / Michelle Potuzak vs Naila Campbell / Ann Hughes6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulie Mudge / Ming Keadle vs Jennifer Schreck / Cynthia Delay2-6, 6-7
2023-04-03vs LMSMITH/EdgemoorWon 40
W#1 DoublesDebbie Newman / Morgan Hawk vs Stephanie Schaeper / Margaret Dlugos6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAna Endsjo vs MaryGwen Murash6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMing Keadle / Anya Balcerzak vs Erika Buchholz / Tracey McKenna6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPhebby Benton vs Jennife Roberts6-3, 6-0
2023-03-20vs LABrandon/LNTCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJulie Mudge / Michelle Potuzak vs Leslie Gimbel / Elizabeth Kaufman6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesPhebby Benton vs Lisa Dunn6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJane Ravey / Janet Szilagyi vs Laurie Cleveland / Charlene Whichel6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAna Endsjo vs Susan Davis1-6, 2-6
2023-03-13vs LLMoyer/PenninsulaWon 31
W#1 DoublesKirsty Donaldson-Roach / Michelle Potuzak vs Liz Miller / Elizabeth Foreman6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAna Endsjo vs Kimberly Lewis6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMorgan Hawk / Ming Keadle vs Jennifer Garcia / Sharon Cantey6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesPhebby Benton vs Kira Skill3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Morgan Hawk
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.92
Jane Ravey
published
3.86
3.86
Michelle Potuzak
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.82
Janet Szilagyi
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.78
Ming Keadle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Phebby Benton
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 4
3.69
Julie Mudge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Ana Endsjo
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4
3.57
Anya Balcerzak
published 4
3.52
Debbie Newman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Stephanie Nixdorf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Potuzak + Debbie Newman6655% games+8.4% vs expected
Ana Endsjo + Phebby Benton9552% gamesnot enough data
Phebby Benton + Morgan Hawk11360% gamesnot enough data
Julie Mudge + Michelle Potuzak3457% gamesnot enough data
Julie Mudge + Janet Szilagyi3254% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Potuzak + Janet Szilagyi4161% gamesnot enough data
Janet Szilagyi + Debbie Newman314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Mudge + Debbie Newman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Morgan Hawk
65W–14L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
4.30
Jane Ravey
24W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
Kirsty Donaldson-Roach
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Michelle Potuzak
150W–116L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Ming Keadle
110W–86L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Phebby Benton
170W–72L career · 11 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Julie Mudge
102W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Ana Endsjo
112W–98L career · 7 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Anya Balcerzak
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Debbie Newman
67W–94L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Stephanie Nixdorf
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.