Teams

NJ NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-29vs LTC-D ORANGEWon 41
L#1 DoublesJennifer Grube / Natasha Uecker vs Kylie Sumpter / Kathleen Sumpter5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Eng vs Margaret Kuhn6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRachel Price / Rebecca Strobel vs Julie Gall / Peggy Hofstra7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesShaun Howe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarrie Poulsen / Marlene Swartz vs Ursula Hamel / Molly Balmes6-3, 6-3
2025-05-22vs NJ REDWon 41
W#1 DoublesJennifer Grube / Shaun Howe vs April DeLauro / Lydia Pistol6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMarlene Swartz vs Derria Banta4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKerry Mobley / Pamela Johnstone vs Holly Bristol / Jennifer Lyons6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCarrie Poulsen vs Renee Richker6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRebecca Strobel / Leah Vladika vs Denise Champion / Kris Hansen6-4, 6-4
2025-05-15vs BP GREENWon 32
W#1 DoublesLeah Vladika / Marlene Swartz vs Judith Law / Susan Gallo6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Eng vs Katherine Moriarty6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Strobel / Rachel Price vs Melissa Richmond / Katie Todd1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPamela Johnstone vs Ashley Binau4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Poulsen / Shaun Howe vs Lauren Villaverde / Laura Pinnie6-1, 6-2
2025-05-08vs MVCC REDWon 41
W#1 DoublesNatasha Uecker / Jennifer Grube vs Linda Strauss / Susan Whatley7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRachel Eng vs Jennifer Halboth6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRachel Price / Pamela Johnstone vs Gwen Riley / Linda Wagner6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMarlene Swartz vs Carol Zimlinghaus3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarrie Poulsen / Shaun Howe vs Kellie Bonthron / April O'Dell6-3, 6-3
2025-05-01vs RHCC BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesNatasha Uecker / Jennifer Grube vs Melissa Pugh / Rachel Adams3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRachel Eng vs Mindi Pearse4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRachel Price / Carrie Poulsen vs Valerie VanAlsburg / Maria Lucas6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLeah Vladika vs Carrie Warren1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKerry Mobley / Pamela Johnstone vs Kirstin McConnell / Susan Weese6-2, 6-2
2025-04-24vs LTC-M GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Grube / Kerry Mobley vs Patricia Billinger / Lauren Eddy5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Strobel / Rachel Price vs Amy Whittier / Amy Molnar1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShaun Howe vs Meghan McManus2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Poulsen / Leah Vladika vs KATIE GUYON / Emily Schaeff-accetta6-1, 6-3
2025-04-17vs HIW REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesNatasha Uecker / Rachel Eng vs Lauren Anderson / Danielle Rooney4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarlene Swartz / Leah Vladika vs Deirdre Brigham / Lindsey Strickler6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Johnstone / Kerry Mobley vs Amy Long / Katie Linkner7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Pamela Johnstone
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Marlene Swartz
usually #2 Doubles 20%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Kerry Mobley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Natasha Uecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Shaun Howe
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Carrie Poulsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.30
Leah Vladika
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Rebecca Strobel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Rachel Eng
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Jennifer Grube
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shaun Howe + Carrie Poulsen6261% games+15.4% vs expected
Leah Vladika + Rachel Eng7166% games+13.2% vs expected
Pamela Johnstone + Kerry Mobley16460% games+3.8% vs expected
Pamela Johnstone + Marlene Swartz13559% games+2.9% vs expected
Carrie Poulsen + Marlene Swartz5160% games+1.5% vs expected
Natasha Uecker + Marlene Swartz6357% games+1.0% vs expected
Shaun Howe + Natasha Uecker5256% games−4.3% vs expected
Leah Vladika + Carrie Poulsen4250% games−7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Pamela Johnstone
171W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Marlene Swartz
74W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Kerry Mobley
29W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Natasha Uecker
87W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Shaun Howe
79W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Carrie Poulsen
163W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Leah Vladika
85W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Rebecca Strobel
35W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Rachel Eng
194W–97L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Jennifer Grube
49W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.