Teams

Marco YMCA - Fuccillo

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-04-04vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrita Swanson / Mia Delk vs Lori Coates / Susanne Navarro4-6, 2-6
2023-03-21vs Naples Reserve - GarfunkelWon 10
W#2 DoublesCheryl Solimine / LISA AQUINO vs Samantha Almy / Lynne Huggins6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Bernadette DiPino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Cheryl Solimine
published 4
3.74
LISA AQUINO
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Andrea Washak
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.67
Stephanie Opel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Donna Digeronimo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Inge Lund
published 4
3.61
Marianne Khayat
published
3.56
Beth Rainey
published 3.5
3.39
Bridget Smagala
published 3.5
3.30
Jacqueline Heise
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Mia Delk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Brita Swanson
published 3.5
Mary Fischer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernadette DiPino + Andrea Washak471162% games+4.9% vs expected
Jacqueline Heise + Stephanie Opel181453% games−2.8% vs expected
Andrea Washak + Stephanie Opel82043% games−6.2% vs expected
Andrea Washak + Mia Delk6452% gamesnot enough data
Mary Fischer + Andrea Washak5449% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Heise + Andrea Washak4354% gamesnot enough data
Mary Fischer + Stephanie Opel3444% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Heise + LISA AQUINO0543% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bernadette DiPino
318W–110L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Cheryl Solimine
36W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
LISA AQUINO
71W–73L career · 1 line in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Andrea Washak
352W–306L career · 10 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Stephanie Opel
192W–136L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Donna Digeronimo
107W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Inge Lund
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Marianne Khayat
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Beth Rainey
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Bridget Smagala
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Jacqueline Heise
162W–149L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Mia Delk
270W–304L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Brita Swanson
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Mary Fischer
122W–111L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.