Teams

Nair/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-09vs Dannemiller/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesErica Swatzyna / Jennifer Larkin vs Jessica Lancaster / Kelly Kitabchi2-1
L#1 SinglesMaricela Robles-Murguia vs Jean Ellen Sisson2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesFaith Ruch vs Lindsay Adams3-6, 0-6
2024-10-26vs Livingston/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnn Yackel / Xiaoqun Akers vs Mary Trotz / Sara Yarrow2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMaricela Robles-Murguia vs Margaret Johnson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-24vs Vaughan/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaricela Robles-Murguia / Ann Yackel vs Whitney Mowdy / Patricia Harris6-0, 0-0
W#1 SinglesAmasa Lacy vs Emily Green6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesXiaoqun Akers / Salina Xu vs Samantha Hatchett / Virginia Wynn6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesFaith Ruch vs Libby Nabors6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Erica Swatzyna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Maricela Robles-Murguia
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Ann Yackel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Faith Ruch
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.90
Cathy Poulin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Salina Xu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Amasa Lacy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.79
Kathye Sbravati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Deepa Nair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Xiaoqun Akers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Lisa Monahan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Roz Wallace
published
2.61
Letitia Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Jennifer Larkin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.42
Melissa Taras
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pamela Pierski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maricela Robles-Murguia + Ann Yackel4259% games+7.7% vs expected
Deepa Nair + Ann Yackel6059% games+6.0% vs expected
Salina Xu + Xiaoqun Akers4746% games−0.7% vs expected
Erica Swatzyna + Ann Yackel3246% games−1.1% vs expected
Lisa Monahan + Cathy Poulin224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Monahan + Deepa Nair033 matchesnot enough data
Deepa Nair + Letitia Phillips123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Swatzyna
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Maricela Robles-Murguia
24W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.14
3.5
Ann Yackel
23W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Faith Ruch
20W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Cathy Poulin
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
Salina Xu
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Amasa Lacy
29W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Kathye Sbravati
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Deepa Nair
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Xiaoqun Akers
18W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Lisa Monahan
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Roz Wallace
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Letitia Phillips
10W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Jennifer Larkin
7W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Melissa Taras
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
Pamela Pierski
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.