Teams

EM RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs GTC BLACKLost 05
L#1 DoublesDavid May / Gregory Fritsch vs Joshua Rozman / Kevin Matney3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Paulling vs Nikolai Voitsekhovitch3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEric Lamar / Joe Mahoney vs David Baker / Suresh Gevaran6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPaul Barben vs Sergio Quintana7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSeth Turner / Hayes Trotter vs Bruce Silver / Daniel Stover6-7, 4-6
2024-05-22vs CP REDLost 05
L#1 DoublesJohn Esbenshade / David Ekedahl vs Thorn Luth / David Morrison3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Barben vs Andrew Pham3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSeth Turner / Hayes Trotter vs Ark Wang / Karl Andreasen1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesGregory Fritsch vs Tony Ferrufino4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid May / Daniel Moe vs Jeremy Carman / Antonio Vigil2-6, 3-6
2024-05-15vs DTC NAVYLost 14
L#1 DoublesJoe Mahoney / John Esbenshade vs Neil Roper / Jake Fell4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesWilliam Paulling vs Jeremiah Baronberg6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaniel Moe / Hayes Trotter vs David Fawley / Christopher Watts4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Ekedahl vs Kevin Hays2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid May / Seth Turner vs Gary Friedman / Mark Carlson2-6, 4-6
2024-05-08vs WP ORANGELost 14
L#1 DoublesPaul Barben / Gregory Fritsch vs Ryan MacDowell / Lionel Pomerantz1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Paulling vs Brandon Kalusa1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHayes Trotter / Eric Lamar vs Matt Whitmer / Chad Whitmer6-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDavid Ekedahl vs Justin Weigle6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Moe / David May vs Greg Hamilton / Kirk Arza4-6, 2-6
2024-05-05vs SKY SILVERLost 14
W#1 DoublesJoe Mahoney / Gregory Fritsch vs Brian Winterling / John Barker6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesWilliam Paulling vs Daniel Cho5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Ekedahl / John Esbenshade vs David Bacon / Seth Meyer6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesEric Lamar vs Coupar Lester6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Moe / Seth Turner vs Matt Moon / Chris Burckhardt3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-24vs CACM REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesJohn Esbenshade / Joe Mahoney vs Adam Huff / Michael Hallowell6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPaul Barben vs Eddie Pells6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Ekedahl / Eric Lamar vs Todd Harrington / Carter Harrington2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGregory Fritsch vs Raghav Mathur5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Moe / David May vs Tab McGinley / Bob Bolger3-6, 5-7
2024-04-17vs ATC REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesGregory Fritsch / Joe Mahoney vs Brendan Soane / Chris Koehn3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Barben vs Tyler Fairbairn4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Moe / John Esbenshade vs Peter Ludwig / Paul Ivancie7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesHayes Trotter vs Peter Dinneen6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEric Lamar / David May vs Mark Soane / Ted Pomeroy2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
David Ekedahl
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.76
Eric Lamar
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Joe Mahoney
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.72
John Esbenshade
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Daniel Moe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Gregory Fritsch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.51
Paul Barben
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
William Paulling
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.48
Hayes Trotter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.30
Seth Turner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Fritsch + Joe Mahoney2547% games+3.8% vs expected
David Ekedahl + John Esbenshade2649% games+1.5% vs expected
Gregory Fritsch + Hayes Trotter2338% games−3.0% vs expected
John Esbenshade + Joe Mahoney0546% games−7.0% vs expected
Daniel Moe + Hayes Trotter2637% games−8.8% vs expected
Daniel Moe + Seth Turner0637% games−9.7% vs expected
Seth Turner + Hayes Trotter0531% games−11.7% vs expected
Gregory Fritsch + John Esbenshade224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Ekedahl
80W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Eric Lamar
8W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Joe Mahoney
37W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
John Esbenshade
37W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Daniel Moe
29W–68L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Gregory Fritsch
26W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Paul Barben
24W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
William Paulling
7W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Hayes Trotter
17W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
Seth Turner
10W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.