Teams

Cargle (Rome)

2024 CVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '23 · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-09-11vs CVTA/Tina JonesLost 01
L#2 SinglesSuleyka Miranda vs Sarah Blasius2-6, 0-1
2023-08-14vs Cargle (Summerville)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTerina Fowler / Suleyka Miranda vs Charlene Mathis / Phyllis Searles6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Rachel Hyde
published
3.21
Jill Robinson
published
3.20
Hannah Carr
published
3.15
Beverley Floyd
published 3.5
3.15
Bethany Nails
published 3.5
3.05
Dawn Paxten
published 3.5
2.98
Melissa Touchstone
published
2.96
Hannah Laury
published
2.96
Kristen Leezer
published
2.96
Terina Fowler
published
2.92
Suleyka Miranda
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.77
Jessica Dunn
published
2.74
Ashley Venkatesu
published 3.5
2.60
Debbie Maxwell
published 3
Patti Ledbetter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Hyde + Hannah Laury033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Hyde
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Jill Robinson
32W–17L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Hannah Carr
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Beverley Floyd
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Bethany Nails
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Dawn Paxten
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
Melissa Touchstone
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.98
Hannah Laury
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.96
Kristen Leezer
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.96
Terina Fowler
28W–44L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.96
3
Suleyka Miranda
28W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.92
Jessica Dunn
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%3%97%
2.77
3.5
Ashley Venkatesu
16W–21L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.74
3
Debbie Maxwell
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
Patti Ledbetter
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.