Teams

Applecross Aces

Adult Tri-Level League · Men's Tri Level 4.5 - IW

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-22vs UMLY UnitedWon 10
W#1 DoublesTodd Brown / Augusto Francisco vs Andy Chung / ANDRES VIVANCO6-3, 6-3
2022-10-15vs BallerzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTodd Brown / Justin DePietropaolo vs Loc Huynh / Vincent Voulo7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAugusto Francisco / Mike Martinelli vs Daniel Cho / Elanchezhiyan Panneerselvam2-6, 2-6
2022-09-24vs BallerzLost 02
L#1 DoublesTodd Brown / Allen Cheung vs Long Nguyen / Don Vo1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAugusto Francisco / Mike Martinelli vs Elanchezhiyan Panneerselvam / Taichi Naka1-6, 1-6
2022-09-17vs Tennis AddictionSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTodd Brown / Allen Cheung vs Steven Motyka / Craig Evans0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJustin DePietropaolo / Augusto Francisco vs R Bruce Fazio / Farid Razavi6-2, 6-0
2022-09-10vs UMLY UnitedLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllen Cheung / Augusto Francisco vs Kai Czubryt-Ogino / Syed Nasir0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSibasisha Padhy / Mike Martinelli vs Markus Edstrom / Ian Monson1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's Tri Level 4.5 - IW have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Allen Cheung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Augusto Francisco
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Sibasisha Padhy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Justin DePietropaolo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Mike Martinelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Augusto Francisco + Todd Brown7746% games+2.7% vs expected
Augusto Francisco + Justin DePietropaolo3447% games−8.0% vs expected
Allen Cheung + Todd Brown1433% gamesnot enough data
Sibasisha Padhy + Augusto Francisco044 matchesnot enough data
Allen Cheung + Augusto Francisco123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allen Cheung
61W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
Augusto Francisco
105W–211L career · 5 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Sibasisha Padhy
15W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.50
Justin DePietropaolo
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
Mike Martinelli
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Todd Brown
80W–84L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.