Teams

EFSC - Flores

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.36 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs Kiwi - RamseyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Abbott / Emilio Ampuero vs Brett Lindenberg / Stephen Ramsey6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Flores / William Honaker vs Rafael Reyes / Keith Schachter6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Eskridge / Jacob Kargauer vs Chad McCall / Eric Mulhern2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-13vs Fee - MooreWon 20
W#2 DoublesDaniel Flores / Trey Crowley vs Isidro Zavaleta / Stephen Pokol6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBruno Pintchovski Rodrigues / Elliott Hulscher vs Kenneth Moore / James Curzan Jr6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Jacob Kargauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Zachary Eichholz
published 4.5
4.21
Michael Phelipa
published 4.5
4.13
Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Daniel Flores
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Jason Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Nathan Hartnett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Trey Crowley
published
3.84
Elliott Hulscher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
William Honaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Thomas Eskridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues + Michael Phelipa121250% games−11.9% vs expected
Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues + Zachary Eichholz5445% gamesnot enough data
Jacob Kargauer + Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jacob Kargauer
19W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.38
4.5
Zachary Eichholz
83W–46L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Michael Phelipa
109W–62L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues
98W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Daniel Flores
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%55%<1%
4.02
Jason Abbott
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
Nathan Hartnett
21W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
Trey Crowley
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Elliott Hulscher
89W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
William Honaker
66W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Thomas Eskridge
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.