Teams

Stevens - CCNC

2026 Sandhills Tri Level 55 & Over · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-01vs Davidson - Pinehurst ResortWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeidi Stevens / Joy Martin vs Laura Davidson / Nannette Goodwin3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney McGuirt / Lisa Nixon vs Julie Milton / Mia Delk7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCornelia Morris / Lisa Cook vs Jamie Moss / Lorin Johnson6-3, 6-3
2026-07-22vs Platt - Lawn and Tennis 55+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJoy Martin / Amy Moubry vs Tara Platt / Annie Osterman6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCourtney McGuirt / Elizabeth Webster vs Del Metcalf / Ann Tucker0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCornelia Morris / Lisa Cook vs Sandra Barnhardt / Jen Barton4-6, 3-6
2026-07-15vs Davidson - Pinehurst ResortWon 21
W#1 DoublesELIZABETH BODE / Heidi Stevens vs Elizabeth Hasty / Nannette Goodwin6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmie Irby / Elizabeth Webster vs Mia Delk / Kris Downing6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCornelia Morris / Louise Lucas vs Sondra Montesi Yates / Megan Mercer4-6, 0-6
2026-07-01vs Platt - Lawn and Tennis 55+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHeidi Stevens / Joy Martin vs Tara Platt / Susan Omell4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Nixon / Elizabeth Webster vs Mary Howard / Del Metcalf1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Cook / Virginia Forbis vs Kelley Hester / Sandra Barnhardt6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-24vs Davidson - Pinehurst ResortLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeidi Stevens / Amy Moubry vs Elizabeth Hasty / Frances Morris6-4, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney McGuirt / Elizabeth Webster vs Victoria Adkins / Julie Milton2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLouise Lucas / Cornelia Morris vs Sondra Montesi Yates / Jamie Moss1-6, 0-6
2026-06-10vs Platt - Lawn and Tennis 55+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesELIZABETH BODE / Joy Martin vs Tara Platt / Angie Kelly4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Nixon / Elizabeth Webster vs Del Metcalf / Ann Tucker2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Collom / Virginia Forbis vs Sandra Barnhardt / Michele Santiago6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2026-06-03vs Davidson - Pinehurst ResortLost 03
L#1 DoublesELIZABETH BODE / Amy Moubry vs Nannette Goodwin / Elizabeth Hasty1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmie Irby / Courtney McGuirt vs Mia Delk / Victoria Adkins4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCornelia Morris / Louise Lucas vs Megan Mercer / Lorin Johnson5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-20vs Platt - Lawn and Tennis 55+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHeidi Stevens / Joy Martin vs Tara Platt / Annie Osterman2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Nixon / Amie Irby vs Mary Howard / Ann Tucker4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Cook / Virginia Forbis vs Sandra Barnhardt / Jen Barton0-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Heidi Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Joy Martin
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.60
ELIZABETH BODE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Amy Moubry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.22
Lisa Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Amie Irby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Elizabeth Webster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Courtney McGuirt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Louise Lucas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Virginia Forbis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Beth Collom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Cornelia Morris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ELIZABETH BODE + Amy Moubry0734% games−21.9% vs expected
Amie Irby + Cornelia Morris5153% gamesnot enough data
Amie Irby + Courtney McGuirt2351% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Nixon + Joy Martin3255% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Stevens + Joy Martin044 matchesnot enough data
Courtney McGuirt + ELIZABETH BODE224 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Stevens + ELIZABETH BODE123 matchesnot enough data
Courtney McGuirt + Cornelia Morris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heidi Stevens
17W–38L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.67
Joy Martin
56W–80L career · 8 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
ELIZABETH BODE
12W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Amy Moubry
18W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Lisa Nixon
100W–156L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Amie Irby
99W–121L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Elizabeth Webster
9W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Courtney McGuirt
57W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Louise Lucas
8W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
Virginia Forbis
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Beth Collom
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Cornelia Morris
51W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.