Teams

Magnon/40/8.0/SOAC

2022 BR Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 BR (40&O) Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-28vs Ducote/40/8.0/CCLALost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Maye / Rebecca Wehrle vs John Sruk / Tricia Bruno1-6, 4-6
2022-07-25vs Ligh/40/8.0/BRECLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Wehrle / Scott Maye vs Nathalie Rademacher / Mark Boudreaux4-6, 4-6
2022-07-21vs Hattier/40/8.0/BOCWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Maye / Rebecca Wehrle vs Umut Meraler / Diana Roman6-4, 6-3
2022-07-12vs Ducote/40/8.0/CCLALost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Maye / Rebecca Wehrle vs John Sruk / Tricia Bruno0-6, 2-6
2022-07-05vs Goings/40/8.0/BRECLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Magnon / Rebecca Wehrle vs Troy Goings / Shawna Gardiner6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 BR (40&O) Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Glen Harvey
published 4
3.74
Kellie Momenzadeh
published
3.73
Kim Elston
published
3.61
Scott Maye
published
3.30
Michael Engle
published
3.22
Rebecca Wehrle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Katherine Hines
published
3.19
Dana Baggett
published 3.5
3.18
Stephen Magnon
published
3.13
Daniel Vitteri
published 3.5
Joanna L Harvey
published
Rich Whitlow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Magnon + Katherine Hines134 matchesnot enough data
Scott Maye + Kim Elston033 matchesnot enough data
Michael Engle + Katherine Hines213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Glen Harvey
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kellie Momenzadeh
29W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Kim Elston
42W–56L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Scott Maye
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
Michael Engle
53W–35L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Rebecca Wehrle
100W–117L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Katherine Hines
22W–53L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Dana Baggett
40W–76L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Stephen Magnon
16W–58L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Daniel Vitteri
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Joanna L Harvey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rich Whitlow
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.