Teams

Caguas, La Presion

2024 Tri Level 40 & Over · Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-03vs MagdalisWon 21
L#1 DoublesDarcy Ramirez / Glorimar Sola vs Sonia Lantigua-Garcia / Vanessa Mulero1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesIvelisse Hernandez / Elaine Isaac vs Teresita Morales / Magdalis Costa6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Espinosa-Morales / Alicia Lopez vs Camille Arroyo / Maritza Rivera5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-18vs Las OlimpicasWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Grafals / Glorimar Sola vs Claudia Arana / Elmer Rivera6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesYadir Diaz Narvaez / Ivelisse Hernandez vs Johanna Li Rivera / Elena Ramirez6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Espinosa-Morales / Samantha Ruiz vs Jossie Massa / Marina Torres6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-11-12vs Las Chkas DoradasWon 21
W#1 DoublesGlorimar Sola / Yadir Diaz Narvaez vs Doriluz Amador / Elsa Nieves6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesYelitza Alvelo / Dorcas Sierra vs Lizbeth Febles Centeno / Tatiana Pagan7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Espinosa-Morales / Samantha Ruiz vs Michelle Crespo / Mariela Pagan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-14vs Las Parranderas 40&OverLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarcy Ramirez / Maria Grafals vs Brendalis Borrero / Mary Flores Castro3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElaine Isaac / Yadir Diaz Narvaez vs Janet Ortiz / Erohani Torres6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesOdette Rodriguez / Alicia Lopez vs Rita Bravo / Mayte Vivaldi1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-08vs ELF SQUADWon 21
W#1 DoublesYadir Diaz Narvaez / Glorimar Sola vs Monique Gracia / Suzette Olivieri6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesYelitza Alvelo / Dorcas Sierra vs Araceli Medina / Brenda Rodriguez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Espinosa-Morales / Alicia Lopez vs Monica Alonso / Manuela Presbitero1-6, 2-6
2024-09-16vs MarielaWon 21
W#1 DoublesYadir Diaz Narvaez / Darcy Ramirez vs Irmaris Pizarro / Victoria Perez7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElaine Isaac / Maria Grafals vs Windy Pagan Pagan / Nilda Santiago3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSamantha Ruiz / Odette Rodriguez vs Yamile Alicea / Lilia Pacheco0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mariela511538104
2Caguas, La Presion5111718161
3Magdalis4212618159
4Las Parranderas 40&Over4281024163
5Las Chkas Doradas1581023176
6Las Olimpicas1551328200
7ELF SQUAD1541428189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Yadir Diaz Narvaez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Glorimar Sola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Maria Grafals
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Darcy Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Elaine Isaac
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Ivelisse Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Dorcas Sierra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Yelitza Alvelo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Alicia Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Elizabeth Espinosa-Morales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
2.77
Odette Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Samantha Ruiz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glorimar Sola + Maria Grafals2350% games+17.5% vs expected
Ivelisse Hernandez + Yadir Diaz Narvaez7067% games+11.7% vs expected
Yadir Diaz Narvaez + Dorcas Sierra9459% games+7.0% vs expected
Glorimar Sola + Yadir Diaz Narvaez121152% games+4.8% vs expected
Alicia Lopez + Elizabeth Espinosa-Morales452955% games+3.0% vs expected
Odette Rodriguez + Annette Torres-Morales4160% games+0.4% vs expected
Yadir Diaz Narvaez + Elaine Isaac11554% games−0.6% vs expected
Maria Grafals + Yadir Diaz Narvaez6751% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yadir Diaz Narvaez
177W–105L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.67
Glorimar Sola
65W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Maria Grafals
96W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41
4
Darcy Ramirez
81W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.35
3.5
Elaine Isaac
132W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Ivelisse Hernandez
69W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dorcas Sierra
66W–92L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Yelitza Alvelo
17W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Alicia Lopez
104W–93L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Elizabeth Espinosa-Morales
111W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Annette Torres-Morales
46W–23L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Odette Rodriguez
62W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Samantha Ruiz
27W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.