Teams

KY/LOU/WILLIAMS/JONES

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-16vs KY/LOU/KELLERMAN/WINEBRENNERWon 20
W#1 DoublesAllison Morris / Heather Hise vs Alexandra Lewis / Amanda Sutherland2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEden Hottell / Maggie Phelps vs Michelle Winebrenner / Erica LaFever6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-25vs KY/LOU/FRAZIERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarrie Merrill / Eden Hottell vs Erin Frazier / Kristan Bryant6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKelly Bax vs Beth Tinsley3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-19vs KY/LOU/COURTENAYWon 20
W#1 SinglesEmily Irwin vs Susan Reale6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Gilmore / Alissa Sample vs Dawn Courtenay / Elizabeth Torp6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Carrie Merrill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Heather Hise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Betsy Pfeiffer
published 3
3.00
Alissa Sample
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Emily Irwin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.96
Maggie Phelps
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Mallory Strange
published
2.83
Lashae Higdon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Nicole Jones-Latka
published
2.70
Eden Hottell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Kelly Bax
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mallory Strange + Betsy Pfeiffer224 matchesnot enough data
Heather Hise + Carrie Merrill033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Merrill
30W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Heather Hise
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Betsy Pfeiffer
7W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Alissa Sample
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Emily Irwin
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Maggie Phelps
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Mallory Strange
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
Lashae Higdon
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Nicole Jones-Latka
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Caroline Schifano
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eden Hottell
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Kelly Bax
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.