Teams

Broussard/18s/3.0/SC Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Alexis Shih
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 39% · published 3
Allison Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Chanell Charapata
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3
2.65
Claire Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.57
Catherine Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3
Erin Roy
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Swett
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published
Jenny Vitellaro
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Jessica Hollister
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kristy Broussard
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published
Lacey Schwab
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Michelle Branighan
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sam Yelnick
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Singles 18% · published
Susan Bullock
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Schwab + Erin Roy12366% gamesnot enough data
Kristy Broussard + Jenny Vitellaro4162% gamesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + Michelle Branighan224 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Schwab + Jenny Vitellaro213 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Schwab + Jennifer Swett303 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + Catherine Davenport123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Davenport + Jenny Vitellaro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexis Shih
14W–9L career · type S · 18 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Chanell Charapata
13W–29L career · 15 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Claire Montgomery
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Catherine Davenport
6W–15L career · 11 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Erin Roy
28W–10L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Swett
11W–17L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jenny Vitellaro
20W–28L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Hollister
17W–7L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristy Broussard
15W–17L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lacey Schwab
40W–11L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Branighan
7W–17L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sam Yelnick
7W–4L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Bullock
17W–41L career · 40 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.