Teams

Beerman Game, Set, Lunch - T. Ritter

2023 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-28vs Beerman Simply Smashing - T. LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesNathaly Arredondo / Hayley Hurd vs Tiffany Love / Leslie Simmons2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Hogg vs Brandye Pickering4-6, 3-6
2023-03-21vs LCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Hogg / Leisa Jordan vs Lamanda Petcoff / Lauren Clark1-6, 3-6
2023-03-07vs Beerman - R. EspitiaSplit 11
L#2 SinglesNathaly Arredondo vs Eva Mora0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Ellen Guthrie / Karen Hogg vs Diane Barrera / KATHERINE FOLSOM6-0, 6-3
2023-02-21vs Polk/L. Mason/18&Over3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Hogg / Rhonda Harris vs Jennifer Burns / Meghan Savant5-7, 1-6
2023-02-14vs Beerman - R. CoultonWon 20
W#2 SinglesKaren Hogg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNathaly Arredondo / Clara Copley vs Rose Coulton / Hetal Rajguru2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-31Split 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Hogg / Rhonda Harris vs Danielle Miller / Debra Edwards6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNathaly Arredondo / Tracey Ritter vs Christina Beissinger / Lisa Pearce6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-24vs LCCWon 10
W#2 SinglesKaren Hogg vs Deanna Bayless6-4, 6-0
2023-01-10vs Beerman - R. EspitiaWon 10
W#1 SinglesKaren Hogg vs Laurie Grieger6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Nathaly Arredondo
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.10
Hayley Hurd
published 3.5
2.92
Karen Hogg
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Leisa Jordan
published
2.59
Tracey Ritter
published
2.54
Clara Copley
published 3
Sara Margeson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leisa Jordan + Karen Hogg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nathaly Arredondo
78W–70L career · 7 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Hayley Hurd
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Karen Hogg
84W–99L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Leisa Jordan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Tracey Ritter
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Clara Copley
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Sara Margeson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.