Teams

Permenter

2025 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 18 & Over · 6.0 Adult Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-07vs Landrum/LottWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Perrin / Kourtney Hanslik vs Mike Peeples / Alicia Smith6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJB Henderson / Laura Henderson vs Hayden Everitt / Samantha Chitsey6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarty Cleckler / Robin Perrin vs Jaxon Lott / Hampton Hays6-1, 6-1
2025-06-30vs CopelandLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarty Cleckler / Anna Purdue vs Mark Smith / Allison Childress4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChamonix Mejia / Lance Permenter vs Ryan Wulfjen / Leslie Morgan4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Thoms / Jonathan Thoms vs Aaron Gray / Blake Childress4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Sandra Thoms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Kourtney Hanslik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Emma Veld
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
James Perrin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
JB Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Marty Cleckler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Lance Permenter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Chamonix Mejia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Anna Purdue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Laura Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Robin Perrin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Gregory Cook
published
Jonathan Thoms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Thoms + Jonathan Thoms1441% gamesnot enough data
Robin Perrin + James Perrin224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Henderson + JB Henderson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Thoms
31W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.64
Kourtney Hanslik
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Emma Veld
21W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
James Perrin
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
JB Henderson
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Marty Cleckler
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Lance Permenter
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
Chamonix Mejia
9W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Anna Purdue
9W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
Laura Henderson
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Robin Perrin
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Gregory Cook
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Jonathan Thoms
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.